Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (1.62 seconds)
Documents citing Pal Singh vs National Thermal Power Corporation ... on 15 February, 2002

Dr Bina Modi vs Lalit Kumar Modi & Ors on 24 December, 2020

Though McDonald India Pvt. Ltd. supra being a dicta of the Division Bench of this Court would be binding on me but once the same is found RFA (OS) 21/2020 & RFA (OS) 22/2020 Page 22 of 103 to be per incuriam qua Kvaerner Cementation India Limited supra, a dicta of the three Judges Bench of the Supreme Court, it has been held in Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited 2002 SCC OnLine Del 178 that a dicta of a larger bench of the High Court does not bind when the law even if earlier in point of time pronounced by the Supreme Court is otherwise and especially when the larger bench of the High Court has not noticed the law as declared by the Supreme Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 102 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar And Anr. vs The Presiding Officer And Anr. on 9 September, 2005

12. In the present matter also the services of the appellant workmen were terminated way back in September, 1986. Their termination was upheld by the Labour Court in its award made on 1.12.1994. The appellant workmen succeeded before the learned single Judge, who in his judgment and order dated 29.5.2002 held that their services were protected under Section 25F read with Section 25B of the Act. Following the ratio laid down in the above judgments, we feel that in view of the long passage of time it will not be appropriate to issue direction for re-instatement with back wages and the learned single Judge was right in holding that compensation should be paid to the appellants herein. In this regard it may also be noted that that the two appellants hadorked only for the period of 581 and 569 days during the period 1984 to 1986 with the respondent-Corporation.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 148 - S Khanna - Full Document

Lords Homeopathic Laborites Pvt. Ltd. vs Ms. Lissy Unnikunju And Ors. on 10 February, 2006

In a large number of cases, this Court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child v. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and Ors. 109 (2004) DLT 292; Suraj Pal Singh and Ors. v. P. O. Labour Court and Anr. 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. v. Secretary (Labour) and Ors. 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Shri Pal Singh v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 III AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products v. Naipal Singh and Ors. 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and Ors. v. The P. O. Labour Court and Anr. 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India v. J. R. Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 163 - M Katju - Full Document

Sh. Prem Ranjan And Others vs M/S Sds Securities Security (Private) ... on 26 February, 2008

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ram Milan vs M/S Salwan Montessori School on 20 July, 2007

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Sandeep Yadav vs M/S A.D.S Advertising Private Ltd on 1 September, 2007

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rajbir Singh vs M/S Cobra Group on 11 September, 2007

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Om Prakash vs M/S Punjab Scientific Industries on 24 August, 2007

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ved Prakash vs M/S The Nacon Marketing Services Pvt. ... on 29 September, 2007

"In a large number of cases, this court has granted compensation instead of reinstatement vide Model School for Mentally Deficient Child Vs. Mukh Ram Prasad Maurya and others 109 (2004) DLT 292, Suraj Pal Singh And others Vs. P.O, Labour Court and another 2002 v. AD (Delhi) 706; Harsha Tractors Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour) and others 2001 III AD (Delhi) 746; Sh. Pal Singh Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. 2002 111 AD (Delhi) 1059; Sain Steel Products Vs. Naipal Singh and others 2001 LLR 566; R. Mugum and others Vs. The P.O. Labour Court and another 2000 VI AD (Delhi) and State Bank of India Vs. J.R.Surma 2002 VII AD (Delhi) 325.
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next