Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (2.50 seconds)
Documents citing Harbans Singh Jalal, Ex-Mla vs Union Of India (Uoi), Through ... on 27 May, 1997

Angi Ramana vs State Of Ap on 10 March, 2020

47. Relying upon the judgment in the case of N. Ponnuswami, Ghasi Ram & A. Neelalohithadasan supra, the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, had an occasion to consider similar issue in the 46 W.P.(PIL) Nos.177 of 2019 & 18 of 2020 case of Harbans Singh Jalal, Ex-MLA v. Union of India9. The Court, relying upon the judgment in Ghasi Ram, observed as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - J K Maheshwari - Full Document

Muppa Venkate.Swara Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 10 March, 2020

47. Relying upon the judgment in the case of N. Ponnuswami, Ghasi Ram & A. Neelalohithadasan supra, the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, had an occasion to consider similar issue in the 46 W.P.(PIL) Nos.177 of 2019 & 18 of 2020 case of Harbans Singh Jalal, Ex-MLA v. Union of India9. The Court, relying upon the judgment in Ghasi Ram, observed as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - J K Maheshwari - Full Document

Harcharan Singh Brar vs Sukhdarshan Singh And Ors. on 11 July, 2003

The aforesaid proposition has been accepted by a Division Bench of this Court in Harbans Singh Jalal's (supra). The Division Bench, however, also reiterates that one becomes a candidate only on filing the nomination pursuant to the Notification. As noticed earlier, the speeches had been made by the son after respondent No. 1 had filed his nomination papers on 23.1.2002. However, the aforesaid finding would not affect the case of respondent No. 1 as the election petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground that it is Jacking in material facts with regard to the averments made for proving corrupt practices as required under Section 123(7)(d) of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 1 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Mohinder Singh vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 12 October, 2006

In our opinion, the submissions of the learned Counsel run counter, to the view taken by a Division Bench in the case of Harbans Singh Jalal, Ex. M.L.A., Bathinda (supra). In this case, it has been categorically held that the Election Commission was entitled to take necessary steps for the conduct of a free and fair election. We may reproduce the relevant observations of the Division as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 58 - Cited by 3 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Pon Paramaguru vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 31 March, 2006

45. In paragraph 19 of the counter affidavit, it has been emphasised that it is open to the Election Commission by exercising the power under Article 324 of the Constitution to enforce the Model Code of Conduct even before the notification is issued and such Model Code of Conduct can be enforced from the date of enforcement of the election schedule. It has been further submitted that the the decision of the Punjab High Court in Civil Writ Petition NO.270 of 1997 dated 27.5.19 97 in Harbans Singh Jalal v. Union of India and others (1997-2 PLR 77 8) that the Model Code of Conduct is enforceable from the date of announcement of the Election Schedule has been upheld by the Supreme Court by order dated 26.4.2001 in SLP.No.22724 of 1997.
Madras High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 2 - P K Misra - Full Document

**** vs Navjot Singh Sidhu & Ors on 6 December, 2010

(6). The petitioner has filed his reply to the application refuting the plea(s) taken by the first respondent and reiterating that the election petition discloses the 'material facts' and 'particulars' as the petitioner need not to have pleaded the evidence as well. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also cited various decisions like (i) S.Raghbir Singh Gill v. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra & Ors., AIR 1980 SC 1362(1); (ii) Harbans Singh Jala v. Union of India, 1997(3) RCR (Civil) 355; (iii) Gajanan Krishnaji Bapat & Anr. v. Dattaji Raghobaji Meghe & Ors., (1995) 5 SCC 347;(relied upon by first respondent too) (iv) Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 SC 851(1); (v) Smt. Rekha Rana v. Jaipal Sharma & Ors., JT 2009(9) SC 285; (vi) A.Neelalohithadasan Nadar v. George Mascrene & Ors., 1994 Supp(2) SCC 619; (vii) KK Ramachandran Master v. MV Sreyamakumar & Ors., JT 2010 (6) SC 480 (relied upon by first respondent too); CM No.2E of 2010 in EP No.3 of 2009.doc -8- and (viii) Harkirat Singh v. Amrinder Singh, (2005) 13 SCC 511; to bring his points home.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - S Kant - Full Document
1   2 Next