Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.38 seconds)

Shri Petlu Konwar vs The State Of Assam on 26 May, 2016

[39] A Division Bench of this Court, in the case of Abdul Hakim Quadri (supra), had noted that the format of recording confessional statement is only a guideline in consonance with the spirit of Section 164 Cr.PC to read the mind of the accused and to ascertain that the indictable statement was not given under the duress, threat or influence of any person. It was observed that the guideline should be followed in letter and spirit and sundry infractions or breach of the format will not render the statement inadmissible in evidence.
Gauhati High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - A K Goswami - Full Document

Munin Chandra Das vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 10 September, 2019

Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to an order of this Court Page No.# 4/4 dated 06.09.2018, passed in WP(C) No.523/2017 ( Abdul Hakim Vs. State of Assam ) and contends that in an identical case, this Court had directed that the answers script of the said petitioner pertaining to 18 questions should be scrutinized by an independent expert examiner to be appointed by the respondents and depending upon the outcome of such scrutiny, to take consequential steps. He, therefore, submits that similar order may be passed in the case of the present petitioners as well.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - U Bhuyan - Full Document
1