Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 546 (1.25 seconds)

Ramji Lal (Dar) vs Arun Kumr (Fir 406/21 Ps Amb.Nagar ... on 24 April, 2025

34. The petitioner was a vegetable seller. It was held in the case of "Mohan Soni Vs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors. I (2012) ACC 1 (SC)" that in the context of loss of future earning, any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of work being performed by the person suffering the disability. This is the basic premise and once that is grasped, it clearly follows that the same injury or loss may affect two different persons in different ways. Take the case of a marginal farmer who does his cultivation work himself and ploughs his land with his own two hands, the loss of one of the legs to the marginal farmer would be the end of the road in so far his earning capacity is concerned. But in case of person engaged in some kind of desk work in an office, the loss of leg may not have same effect. The loss of a leg (or for that matter the loss of any limb) to any one is bound to have very traumatic effects on one's personal, family or social life but the loss of one of the legs to a person working in an office would not interfere with his work/earning capacity in the same degree as in the case of marginal farmer or a cycle rickshaw-puller.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahesh Rajak ( Dar ) vs Gaurav And Ors. ( Fir No.465/21, Ps. ... on 30 May, 2024

31. It was held in the case of "Mohan Soni Vs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors. I (2012) ACC 1 (SC)" that in the context of loss of future earning, any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of work being performed by the person suffering the disability. This is the basic premise and once that is grasped, it clearly follows that the same injury or loss may affect two different persons in different ways. Take the case of a marginal farmer who does his cultivation work himself and ploughs his land with his own two hands, the loss of one of the legs to the marginal farmer would be the end of the road in so far his earning capacity is concerned.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vinay Kumar Rangan (Dar) vs Akash Kumar (Fir No.N 133/21, Ps Mal ... on 30 May, 2024

23. It was held in the case of "Mohan Soni Vs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors. I (2012) ACC 1 (SC)" that in the context of loss of future earning, any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of work being performed by the person suffering the disability. This is the basic premise and once that is grasped, it clearly follows that the same injury or loss may affect two different persons in different ways. Take the case of a marginal farmer who does his cultivation work himself and ploughs his land with his own two hands, the loss of one of the legs to the marginal farmer would be the end of the road in so far his earning capacity is concerned. But in case of person engaged in some kind of desk work in an office, the loss of leg may not have same effect.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Mohan Trivedi Fir No.67/21, Hauz ... vs Jitender Bhadana on 30 September, 2024

50. It was held in the case of "Mohan Soni Vs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors. I (2012) ACC 1 (SC)" that in the context of loss of future earning, any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of work being Petition No. : 98/2023 Page No.29/38 FIR NO. 67/2021 PS Hauz Khas Ram Mohan Trivedi vs. Jitender Bhadana and ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next