Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (2.02 seconds)
Documents citing V.O.John vs M/S.Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd on 2 January, 2009

Union Bank Of India vs M/S. Suwique Traders on 26 June, 2025

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench in M/s. Kinship Services (India) (P) Ltd. [2013 (4) KHC 21], we find that the challenge made in this writ appeal against the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge to the extent of granting such a direction against the 1st appellant Bank is perfectly maintainable in an intra court appeal filed under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act.
Kerala High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Union Bank Of India vs M/S. Southern Cashew Exporters on 10 December, 2025

18. From the materials on record, we notice that previously the learned Single Judge passed an order dated 26.09.2025 in the original petition staying the operation of Ext.P7 order dated 16.09.2025 of the Tribunal for a period of one month. Challenging the interim order, the appellants filed W.A.No.2388 of 2025 before this Court. However, on finding that the interim order issued by the learned Single Judge is one issued in exercise of the W.A.No.2689 of 2025 21 2025:KER:95040 supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and hence is not appealable under the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in John V.O. v. Catholic Syrian Bank and Others [2009 (1) KHC 337], this Court dismissed the writ appeal on the ground of maintainability, however, leaving open the legal and factual contentions raised by both sides. It is the aforesaid original petition is now finally disposed of by the learned Single Judge as per the impugned judgment.
Kerala High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Union Bank Of India vs M/S. Southern Cashew Exporters on 24 October, 2025

In John V.O. v. Catholic Syrian Bank and others [2009 (1) KHC 337], a Division Bench of this Court held that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of W.A.No.2388 of 2025 5 2025:KER:79459 India is not an original jurisdiction and therefore no writ appeal is maintainable under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act when the relief granted by the learned Single Judge is one exercising the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Section 5 of the Act provides for intra court appeal only against an order passed by the learned Single Judge under the original jurisdiction.
Kerala High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document
1