State Of Karnataka vs Naveen Suhag on 28 May, 2020
6) 2014 AIR SCW 6168 Supreme Court in the case of
Munna Vs. State of M.P.
18
S.C. 1085/2015
In this case also similar observation
made by the Hon'ble supreme court with
regard to absence of injuries and absence
of raising alram or delay in FIR, not by itself
be enough to disbelieve version of
Prosecutrix inview of presumption under
Section 114-A of evidence Act. But, the
infirmities in the Statement creates doubt
about its veracity, the same cannot be
acted upon. Therefore, the benefit of
doubt must be given to Accused.