Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing Management Of Fertilizer Corporation ... vs The Workmen on 15 November, 1968

Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ... vs Presiding Officer And Ors. on 15 April, 2004

38.As regards the first issue, the Supreme Court noted in Sudhakar that the decision in Prabhavathy (rendered by a Bench of three learned Judges) had not been brought to the notice of the Bench that decided The Management of LIC vs. Their Workmen (consisting of two learned Judges). It was then held that in view of the order in Prabhavathy, there was no justification for the Andhra Pradesh High Court to issue the direction that it did. For this reason, the direction issued by the High Court was set aside. As regards the second issue, the Supreme Court noted that it had not limited Prabhavathy to the employees of the Tamil Nadu Division. Consequently, the decision in Prabhavathy would apply to employees of all Divisions of the Petitioner in the country.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - M B Lokur - Full Document

T.Nadu Termd.Full Time Tem.Lic ... vs Life Insurance Corp.Of India . on 18 March, 2015

10. Aggrieved by the said Award, the Corporation 12 preferred SLP No. 14906 of 1988 titled The Management of Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Their Workmen before this Court urging various legal contentions. It is the case of the Corporation that during the course of the said SLP, a compromise was entered into between the Corporation and 8 out of the 9 Unions of the above SLP. Accordingly, this Court passed an order dated 1.3.1989 on the basis of the said compromise. The terms and conditions of the said compromise between the parties therein will be extracted in the reasoning portion of this Judgment.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Bishambhar Prasad vs M/S Arfat Petrochemicals Private ... on 20 April, 2023

and the setting aside of the permission to convert the land’s usage. A similar clause to Article 138 is contained in the Articles/Memorandum of almost every government controlled entity, and has been upheld in Management of Fertilizer Corporation of India v. Their Workmen5 and subsequently affirmed by a Constitution Bench in Sukhdev Singh & Ors. v. Bhagat Ram & Ors.6;
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 3 - S Kant - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be LCA No. 2292/19 Page 9 of 14 decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, LCA No. 2284/19 Page 9 of 14 that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, that the workman "is entitled to receive from the LCA No. 2293/19 Page 10 of 15 employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Industrial Tribunal vs The on 16 March, 2023

"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at which any benefit should be computed", provided however, that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any, money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub- section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next