Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.73 seconds)

Sheo Nath Prasad vs Sarjoo Nonia And Anr. on 12 March, 1943

44. His opinion was that the payment of the amount by the plaintiff to the defendant at the latter's request was a lawful act not in-tended to be done gratuitously by the plaintiff and, therefore, the defendant was bound to make compensation to the plaintiff in respect of the payment. With all respect to the Hon'ble Judge, I must hold that Section 70 does not contemplate the case of payment of money and it will be doing violence to the language of the section to hold that the words 'lawfully does anything' mean payment of money. Sulaiman and Kendall JJ. also applied Section 70, Contract Act, in Kundan Lal v. Bhikari Das ('29) 16 A.I.R. 1929 All. 254 at p. 539. There was no discussion on the section and the learned Judges contented themselves by making the following remarks:
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Federal Bank Ltd. vs M.P. Joseph on 29 March, 1990

In Kundan Lal v. Sahu Bhikhari Das, AIR 1929 All 254, the Division Bench cited those decisions also In support of the proposition that Section 70 is applicable when the hundis embodying the contract between the parties cannot be put into action. In these circumstances, I feel that it is a proper case where Section 70 of the Contract Act can be invoked. The finding of the court below is that Section 70 of the Contract Act is applicable.
Kerala High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lothamasu Sambasiva Rao vs Thadwarthi Balakotiah on 14 November, 1972

14. We may now notice some of the leading cases of the Allahabad High Court, which reveal that the view expressed in Sirdarkuar v. Chandrawati, ( 1882 ) ILR 4 All 330 ; Kundan Lal v. Sahu Bhikhari Das, AIR 1929 All 254; Nazir Khan v. Ram Mohan, AIR 1931 All 183 ( FB ) and Kunwar Bahadur v. Suraj Baksh, AIR 1932 Oudh 235 ( FB ) is no longer good law in view of the subsequent decision of the Full Bench of that Court in Sheo Nath Prasad v. Sarjoo Nonia, AIR 1943 All 220 (FB) which is followed in Lakshmi Narain v. Mt. Aparna Devi, .
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 88 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1