Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Sangeeta vs Surender Kumar And Ors. on 11 November, 2003

R.K. Malik And Ors. vs Kiran Pal And Ors. on 17 May, 2006

v. Bimal Devi II 2000 ACC 380 (DB); Urmila v. Vijinder Singh III 2003 ACC 557; Shashi Jain v. Rajinder Yadav III 2003 ACC 262; Fakeerappa v. K.C.P. Factory ; Manju Devi v. Musafir Paswan IV 2005 ACC 15 (SC); Shyam Narayan v. Kitty Tours IV 2005 ACC 1; New India Assurances v. Anwar Ali III 2003 ACC 584 (DB); Daya Arora v. Kapur Singh IV 2005 ACC 313; Swaran Kanta v. Vijay Agarwal II 2002 ACC 70; Kanta Vohra v. Surat Singh I 2002 ACC 255(DB); Sangeeta v. Surender Kumar I 2004 ACC 266; Asha Gupta v. Ramji Lal I 2003 ACC 272; R.S.R.T.Cor v. Goru Ram III 2005 ACC 377(DB); U.I.I. v. S. Abhinesh III 2005 ACC 218(DB); Lata Wadwa v. State of Bihar ; M. S. Grewal v. Deep Chand Sood .
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 21 - S Khanna - Full Document

Rahul And Ors vs Surender Singh Deceased Thro His ... on 18 November, 2025

3. As per the plaintiffs, they along with defendant No.1 constitute a Joint Hindu Family. Defendant No.1 is Karta of the same. Plaintiffs and defendant No.1, are owners of 2 Kanals 7 Marlas of land situated in Khewat No.620/562 and 18 Marlas of land situated in Khewat No.621/563. The land is ancestral in nature. Plaintiffs being co-parceners have per-existing right in DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.12.02 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No.3804 of 2018 (O&M) 2 the same. Defendant No.1 sold ancestral property vide sale deeds under challenge without any legal necessity and the consent of plaintiffs. The sale deeds are without consideration as no amount was paid in front of Sub Registrar. Plaintiffs claimed that earlier they filed suit titled as 'Sangeeta and another vs. Surender and others' qua alienation of residential house. The same was decreed in their favour on 27.10.2010.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P Jain - Full Document
1