Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 229 (1.87 seconds)
Documents citing Pramod Kumar vs U.P.Sec.Education Services Com. & Ors on 7 March, 2008

Deepak Kalra vs State Of U.P. on 10 February, 2021

The decision in Pramod Kumar (supra) and the decision in the case of Ashiq Ali and another (supra) will permit us to hold that accused be punished for Section 304 Part -I of IPC as it appers that due to being addicted to liquor and being in depression due to loss of business, there was a quarrel between him and his wife. He and his wife had a heated discussion. The judgment of this Court is pressed into service by the learned counsel which is applicable to the facts of this case. Statement recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. shows that he had felt really sorry about the incident. He has children ( second daughter) whom he will have to maintain and he has been in jail for a period of over 10 years.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pradeep Kumar vs State Of U.P. on 12 February, 2021

12. We place reliance on the decision titled Maniben Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 2010 SC 1261, decision of Gujarat High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 954 of 2007 (Gulam Hussain Zalil Ahmed Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat) decided on 5.8.2013 and in Criminal Appeal No. 806 of 2011 (Chhaganbhai Limjibhai Palas Vs. State of Gujarat) decided on 20.11.2013 and the decision of Lucknow Bench of this High Court in Criminal Appeal No.318 of 2015 (Pramod Kumar Vs. State of U.P.) decided on 28.2.2019 so as to see whether the case would fall under what provision of law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Ramji Yadav vs Chancellor Of University And 5 Ors. on 26 March, 2026

In Pramod Kumar v. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission [(2008) 7 SCC 153 : (2008) 2 SCC (L&S) 244 : AIR 2008 SC 1817] this Court Signature Not Verified Signed by: JAGADISHAN AIYER Signing time: 26-03-2026 17:21:57 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:8319 14 W.P. No. 11550/2012 examined the issue as to whether a person lacking eligibility can be appointed and if so, whether such irregularity/illegality can be cured/condoned. After considering the provisions of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983 and the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, this Court came to a conclusion that lacking eligibility as per the rules/advertisement cannot be cured at any stage and making appointment of such a person tantamounts to an illegality and not an irregularity, and thus cannot be cured. A person lacking the eligibility cannot approach the court for the reason that he does not have a right which can be enforced through court."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A.Jaisankar vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 June, 2016

In Pramod Kumar v. U.P.Secondary Education Services Commission & Ors., AIR 2008 SC 1817, this Court examined the issue as to whether a person lacking eligibility can be appointed and if so, whether such irregularity/illegality can be cured/condoned. After considering the provisions of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983 and U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, this Court came to a conclusion that lacking eligibility as per the rules/advertisement cannot be cured at any stage and making appointment of such a person tantamounts to an illegality and not an irregularity, thus cannot be cured. A person lacking the eligibility cannot approach the court for the reason that he does not have a right which can be enforced through court.
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

Dhananjay Kumar Tiwari vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 6 September, 2023

33. The second respondent shall decide the matter bearing in mind the following fundamental and core issues; (i) the issue regarding the claim of working of the writ petitioner from 08.07.1992 onwards till the passing of the approval order dated 16.05.2008 pursuant to the appointment order dated 25.06.1992; (ii) the issue regarding the entitlement of the writ petitioner for the payment of salary as well as regularization in terms of Section 33C of the U.P. Act No. 5 of 1982; (iii) the applicability of the judgment in the case of Ravindra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (6) AWC 6130 and Writ A No. 8234 of 2020 (Pramod Kumar Vs. State of U.P.) along with Writ A No. 1981 of 2021 decided on 14.07.2021; (iv) Import and the impact of the approval; (v) the issue with regard to the existence of vacanies vis-a-vis the sanctioned strength so as to accord entitlement of the regularisation to the writ petitioner (vi) any other ancillary and incidental issue going into the root of the matter.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Singh vs State Of Up Thr. Sec. Home Govt. Of U.P. ... on 10 July, 2025

Considering the fact that the petitioner had intimated to the concerned Police Officer in time but no such action was taken, the impugned order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 258 of 2023, (Pramod Kumar vs. State of U.P.) as well as order dated 07.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Muzaffar Nagar in Criminal Misc. Case No. 751/11 of 2023 (Pramod vs. unknown) under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Police Station Nai Mandi, District Muzaffar Nagar. is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the court concerned to re-consider the material available on record and pass a fresh order for lodging of the FIR as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner (Food) Ayodhya ... on 7 November, 2019

3. Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party Deputy Commissioner (Food) Ayodhya Division Ayodhya is directed to proceed with the Appeal No.58/2019/Barabanki (Pramod Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and Others) and decide the same in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible say within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Chaudhary - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next