Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Rajasthan vs Gurmel Singh And 3 Ors. on 15 March, 1988

Unknown vs Singh And Others on 15 October, 2022

But, considering the fact that the complainant respondent no. 2 has consistently maintained his stand, that he wants to withdraw the proceedings on his own volition and is not duressed upon by the present applicant in all fitness of things in order to resolve the controversy inter se between the parties, this Court while exercising its inherent powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows the compounding application in terms of the assertions made therein, as well as in terms of the respective affidavits, filed by the applicants, as well as the complainant respondent no. 2. As such, the present 482 application would stand disposed of as a consequence thereto, resulting into the closure of the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 947 of 2020, State Vs. Gurmel Singh and Others, but, it would be with a word of caution to the applicants that they should mend their ways in future and would not indulge themselves in any such types of activity lest failing which an appropriate action would be taken by the Police authorities in accordance with law against them.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

State vs Gurmel Singh on 14 May, 2024

State Vs. Gurmel Singh FIR NO.:166/2006, U/s 279/304A IPC PS : Seelampur A. CIS No. of the Case : 461353/2015 B. FIR No. : 166/2006 C. Date of Commission of Offence : 13.03.2006 D. Name of the complainant : Nasruddin S/o Nasir Khan, R/o B-312, Buland Masjid, Shastri Park, Delhi E. Name of the Accused, his : Gurmel Singh S/o Babbra Parentage & Addresses Ram, R/o RZC-68, Nihal Vihar, Paschimpuri, Nangloi, Delhi F. Offence complained of : U/s 279/304A IPC G. Representation on behalf of : Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ld. APP State H. Plea of the Accused : Pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amarjit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 23 July, 2024

23. It is the case of the prosecution that recovery of contraband was effected on 09.05.2015. From the perusal of link evidence coupled with reports of FSL Ex.PW-4/S and Ex.PW-4/T, it transpires that the samples were received in the office of FSL on 19.05.2014. Prosecution has failed to show as to what type of objections were raised by the officials of FSL when the samples were firstly sent to said laboratory on 13.05.2015 and were returned and the manner in which the said objections were later on removed by the investigating officer. As per instructions issued by Narcotic Control Bureau vide standing order No.1 dated 15.03.1988, such samples are required to be sent to the chemical examiner within 72 hours of their seizure. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan Vs. Gurmel Singh 2005 (2) RCR (Criminal) 58 held that as there was unexplained delay of five days in sending the sample to the office of chemical examiner, 10 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 26-07-2024 07:02:38 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:092237 CRA-S-3025-SB-2018 & CRA-S-2974-SB-2018 [11] the possibility of tampering with the same until it reached the laboratory could not be ruled out.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - K Singh - Full Document
1