Kanti Kumari vs The State Of Jharkhand on 26 September, 2022
6. On the other hand, Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for opposite
party no.2 submits that on the assurance of the Company, the opposite
party no.2 and others have purchased the flat, however the said building is
not being properly maintained in spite of the fact that maintenance was
being charged from the petitioners and others. He further submits that in
the complaint petition, it has been disclosed that on the assurance of the
accused persons, opposite party no.2 and others have invested their money
in the flat in question. He further submits that if criminality is there, both
civil and criminal case can go together. He relied upon the judgment passed
by the Uttarakhand High Court in Manish Kumar Agarwal & others v.
State of Uttarakhand & others , decided on 10.09.2020 in Criminal
Miscellaneous Application No.559 of 2020.