Smt. Sonia Verma vs Sh. Ajay Garg on 19 April, 2022
In Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta" [2011(1) RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi):
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 252 (0.89 seconds)Documents citing
Sh. Labhu Lal vs Smt. Sandhya Gupta on 28 September, 2010
Smt. Vidya Devi vs Sh. Chander Mohan on 30 November, 2013
In "Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta", 2011 (1) RCR (Rent) 231
(Delhi), it has been held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that children are very
much dependent on the landlord for the purpose of setting up their business and
such a requirement is a bonafide one. If the respondent wished to settle her
sons and grandsons, and she required accommodation for the same, it could not
be said to be malafide on her part.
Sh. Ram Kumar Gupta vs M/S Babu Lal Ghanshyam Dass on 18 December, 2018
In case titled as "Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta"
Shri Hari Ram Gupta vs Shri Jai Chand on 10 September, 2013
In "Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta", 2011 (1) RCR (Rent) 231
(Delhi), it has been held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that children are very
much dependent on the landlord for the purpose of setting up their business and
such a requirement is a bonafide one. If the respondent wished to settle her
sons and grandsons, and she required accommodation for the same, it could not
be said to be malafide on her part.
Smt. Sawaran Kanta vs Sh. Ram Phal on 4 January, 2016
In Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta 2011(1) RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi),
it has been held by this Court that the children are very much
E. No. 63/2012 Swaran Kanta Vs Ram Phal
Page no. 16 of 21
dependant on the landlord for the purpose of setting up their business
and such a requirement is a bonafide one.
Sh. Suresh Bharija vs Sh. Om Prakash on 23 December, 2014
In Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta 2011(1)
RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi), it has been held by this Court that the children
are very much dependant on the landlord for the purpose of setting up
their business and such a requirement is a bonafide one.
Sh. Krishan Gupta vs Sh. Ramesh Chander on 20 January, 2022
In Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta" [2011(1) RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi):
Sh. Suresh Bharija vs Sh. Jasvinder Singh Hira @ Shunty on 23 December, 2014
In Labhu Lal
Vs. Sandhya Gupta 2011(1) RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi), it has been held by
this Court that the children are very much dependant on the landlord for
the purpose of setting up their business and such a requirement is a
bonafide one.
Sh. Parmanand vs Sh. Sri Ram on 3 December, 2013
In "Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta", 2011 (1) RCR (Rent) 231
(Delhi), it has been held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that children are very
much dependent on the landlord for the purpose of setting up their business and
such a requirement is a bonafide one. If the respondent wished to settle her
sons and grandsons, and she required accommodation for the same, it could not
be said to be malafide on her part.
Shivanu Mehta vs Sh. Vijay Khurana on 29 June, 2015
In Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya
Gupta 2011(1) RCR,(Rent) 231 (Delhi), it has been held by this Court
that the children are very much dependant on the landlord for the
purpose of setting up their business and such a requirement is a
bonafide one.