Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.97 seconds)
Documents citing Raj Kumar Yadav vs Vijay Nath Yadav on 4 January, 2010

Pushpa Devi vs . Ram Kumar Yadav on 11 February, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 9% and hence, compensation is granted Rs. 6861X9/100X17X12 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)(SUPRA).
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs Dtc on 1 December, 2012

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 67% and hence compensation is granted as Rs. 17290 (13300 + 30%) X67/100X12X16 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC).
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bijay Nath Dubey vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 28 November, 2023

6. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide case no. T201805310704423 & case no. T201805310705407 (Rajesh Kumar Yadav vs. Bijay Nath) u/s 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Ram Kishan vs . Bhajan Lal & Ors. on 7 November, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor, compensation is calculated as Rs. 4478X80/100X11X12 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dinesh Kumar vs . Hari Shanakar on 31 January, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 90% and hence, compensation is granted Rs. 4272.97X90X17X12 /100 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeraj Arya vs Manoj on 2 February, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 45% and hence compensation is granted as Rs.7605X45/100X18X12 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying MACT No. 312/10 Neeraj Arya v/s Manoj (Page 14 of 20) -:15:- Neeraj Arya v/s Manoj upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rishi Pal S/O Shri Laxmi Chand vs Sh. Sumender S/O Shri Ved Prakash on 1 April, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 59% and hence, compensation is granted Rs. 3112.2X59/100X17X12 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anupama vs . Manmohan on 28 March, 2013

Considering the disability certificate issued by the doctor wherein the disability has been stated as 30% and hence, compensation is granted Rs. 5200X30X17X12 /100 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Vinod Kumar vs Sh. Pradeep Yadav on 12 April, 2013

Ends of justice would be met, if earning capacity of the petitioner is taken to be FIFTY PERCENT of 30% of permanent disability i.e. 15% and hence, compensation is granted Rs. 5850X15/100X16X12 by applying the ratio of the judgment passed by our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Gulam Nabi Bhat Vs. Md. Arman & Ors (SUPRA) after relying upon the judgment of Apex Court passed in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Yadav 2011 ACJ(SC)wherein their Lordships have pleased to make the following observations.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next