Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 139 (6.10 seconds)

Narendra Amritlal Sheth And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:43:38 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

M/S. Navbharat Potteries Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:59:02 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Ganpatraj Badanraj Mehta vs The Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 01:06:54 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Vardhan Developers vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:53:13 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Spark Developers vs The Commissioner,Mcgm And 2 Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:52:12 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Shri. Desmond John Nicholas D'Silva And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:53:58 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Rajendra Brijratan Mohatta And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ... on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:51:11 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Narendra Amritlal Sheth And 3 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:50:11 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Tulsidas Khimji And 2 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:54:59 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

St Annes Chruch And Anr vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 24 April, 2019

In this connection the judgment in Express Publication (Madurai) Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has been cited. The learned judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in paragraph 25 that the classification which was subject to challenge was not arbitrary. In paragraph 26 the Hon'ble Court held that the aspect of long delay in laying a challenge the validity of the provisions may be a factor to be considered when the constitutional remedy under Article 32 is sought. The Petitioners relied upon the judgment of Motor General Traders & Anr. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 80 (para 24, page 127). In this judgment 80 AIR 1984 SC 121 ::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 00:55:14 ::: SKN/PMW 196/310 2592.13-wp--final.doc Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a mere lapse of time does not lend constitutionality to a provision which is otherwise bad. Time doesn't run in favour of legislation. "If it is ultra vires, it cannot gain legal strength from long failure on the part of lawyers to perceive and set up its invalidity".
Bombay High Court Cites 304 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next