Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.11 seconds)

Kalpagam Bhaskaran vs State. Rep. By

55. Though it is the contention of the respective learned counsel for the accused that there is no res judicata so far as filing of Form 37-I is concerned by placing reliance on the decision in Ansal Properties case (supra), however, it has to be pointed out that the Delhi High Court, in the said decision, has also given a categorical finding that “One form having been rejected, another could be filed so 45/64 http://www.judis.nic.in _______________________ Crl. R.C. Nos. 222, 373, 247 & 251/2019 long as the parties are agreeable with each other and are prepared to honour the agreement”.
Madras High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

Kalpagam Bhaskaran vs State. Rep. By

55. Though it is the contention of the respective learned counsel for the accused that there is no res judicata so far as filing of Form 37-I is concerned by placing reliance on the decision in Ansal Properties case (supra), however, it has to be pointed out that the Delhi High Court, in the said decision, has also given a categorical finding that “One form having been rejected, another could be filed so 45/64 http://www.judis.nic.in _______________________ Crl. R.C. Nos. 222, 373, 247 & 251/2019 long as the parties are agreeable with each other and are prepared to honour the agreement”.
Madras High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

Kalpagam Bhaskaran vs State. Rep. By

55. Though it is the contention of the respective learned counsel for the accused that there is no res judicata so far as filing of Form 37-I is concerned by placing reliance on the decision in Ansal Properties case (supra), however, it has to be pointed out that the Delhi High Court, in the said decision, has also given a categorical finding that “One form having been rejected, another could be filed so 45/64 http://www.judis.nic.in _______________________ Crl. R.C. Nos. 222, 373, 247 & 251/2019 long as the parties are agreeable with each other and are prepared to honour the agreement”.
Madras High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document
1