Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Smt.Satyawati Devi @ Satyawati Tiwari & ... vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 20 April, 2010

Learned counsel, in support of the contention,. placed reliance upon a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ramesh Vrs. State of Tamil Nadu; AIR 2005 S.C. 1989 which has further been relied upon and followed by different decisions of this Court in the cases of Md. Ashfaque Alam; 2006(2) PLJR 535, Rima Devi Vrs. State of Bihar; 2007 (2) PLJR 262, Ashok Kumar Chaurasia V. State of Bihar; 2007 (4) PLJR 271, and Rajiv Kumar V. State of Bihar; 2008(1) PLJR 77). The learned counsel further submitted that the allegations leveled are not only vague rather it is not clear from the complaint petition which of the accused, specifically petitioners, have committed what specific act, on this ground also the impugned order is liable to be quashed.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - A Chandra - Full Document

Radhakant Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 9 August, 2012

In support of his argument, Sri Amish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner has heavily relied on Single Bench Judgment of this Court reported in 2010(3) PLJR 120; Rajiv Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. He submits that for prosecuting the petitioner, it was necessary to indicate in the prosecution report as well as in the analysis report that the seized article was adulterated and injurious to health. In absence of those ingredients, the prosecution under the provisions of P.F.A. Act is not permissible.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document
1