Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 191 (1.99 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shyam Singh & Ors on 4 July, 2011

Shri Rajender Kumar vs Shri Raj Kumar on 8 April, 2015

In the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shyam Singh & Ors., (2011) 7 SCC 65, decided on 04.07.2011, the Supreme Court referred to Ramesh Singh & Anr. v. Satbir Singh & Anr., (2008) 2 SCC 667 and held that the multiplier as per the age of the deceased or the claimant whichever is higher Suit No. 510/14 Page no. 24 of 35 Rajender Kumar Vs Raj Kumar & Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms. Srishti Rustagi vs Sh. Vijay Singh Gautam on 17 March, 2018

No. 79/2014 NS 413/15, New India Assurance Company Ltd. V. Shanti Pathak (Smt) (2007) 10 SCC 1 and National Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Shyam Singh (2011) 7 SCC 65. The mother of deceased Mayank Aggarwal is aged about 61 years as per her Aadhar card Ex. PW1/1. Accident took place on 19.7.2013 and the age of claimant comes to 61 years at the time of accident. As such, age of the claimant is considered as 61 years to ascertain the multiplier.
Delhi District Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.Through ... vs Shri. Haresh Shantilal Avlani And Ors on 19 October, 2016

74. The decision in the case of Susamma Thomas (supra) that the choice of multiplier is to be determined by the age of the deceased or that of the claimants, whichever is higher, and the decision of three-Judges Bench in the case of Trilok Chandra (supra) that selection of multiplier cannot, in all the cases, be solely dependent on the age of the deceased and in case of death of a bachelor, the age of the parents is relevant, is consistently followed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in several other decisions, like, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Charlie; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shanti Pathak and further strengthen in Ramesh Singh Vs. Satbir Singh; Shakti Devi Vs. New India Assurance Co.; National Insurance Co. Vs. Shyam Singh; and Ashwinbhai Modi Vs. Ramchandra Ramkaran Sharma (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.Through ... vs Shri. Nagindas Gopalji Rachh And Ors on 19 October, 2016

74. The decision in the case of Susamma Thomas (supra) that the choice of multiplier is to be determined by the age of the deceased or that of the claimants, whichever is higher, and the decision of three-Judges Bench in the case of Trilok Chandra (supra) that selection of multiplier cannot, in all the cases, be solely dependent on the age of the deceased and in case of death of a bachelor, the age of the parents is relevant, is consistently followed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in several other decisions, like, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Charlie; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shanti Pathak and further strengthen in Ramesh Singh Vs. Satbir Singh; Shakti Devi Vs. New India Assurance Co.; National Insurance Co. Vs. Shyam Singh; and Ashwinbhai Modi Vs. Ramchandra Ramkaran Sharma (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Ltd. ... vs Mrs. Shobha Amarsingh Rajput And Ors on 19 October, 2016

74. The decision in the case of Susamma Thomas (supra) that the choice of multiplier is to be determined by the age of the deceased or that of the claimants, whichever is higher, and the decision of three-Judges Bench in the case of Trilok Chandra (supra) that selection of multiplier cannot, in all the cases, be solely dependent on the age of the deceased and in case of death of a bachelor, the age of the parents is relevant, is consistently followed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in several other decisions, like, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Charlie; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shanti Pathak and further strengthen in Ramesh Singh Vs. Satbir Singh; Shakti Devi Vs. New India Assurance Co.; National Insurance Co. Vs. Shyam Singh; and Ashwinbhai Modi Vs. Ramchandra Ramkaran Sharma (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Naseeb Singh & Ors. vs . Atul Kumar & Ors. on 27 September, 2017

In the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shyam Singh & Ors., (2011) 7 SCC 65, decided on 04.07.2011, the Supreme Court referred to Ramesh Singh & Anr. v. Satbir Singh & Anr., (2008) 2 SCC 667 and held that the multiplier as per the age of the deceased or the claimant whichever is higher would be MACT No. 356452/16 (Old Suit No. 322/12) MACT No.   356446/16 (Old Suit No. 323/12)          Page No. 18    of  28                                                                      Naseeb Singh & ors. vs. Atul Kumar & ors.                                                                          Ishwar Singh & anr. vs. Atul Kumar & ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lalta Devi & Anr. vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors. on 12 January, 2015

In the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shyam Singh & Ors., (2011) 7 SCC 65, decided on 04.07.2011, the Supreme Court referred to Ramesh Singh & Anr. v. Satbir Singh & Anr., (2008) 2 SCC 667 and held that the multiplier as per the age of the deceased or the claimant whichever is higher would be applicable. Para 9 and 10 of the report are apposite:-
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 578 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Delhi Transport Corporation vs Sh. Mohinder Tokas & Ors. on 3 December, 2012

In the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shyam Singh & Ors., (2011) 7 SCC 65, decided on 04.07.2011, the Supreme Court referred to Ramesh Singh & Anr. v. Satbir Singh & Anr., (2008) 2 SCC 667 and held that the multiplier as per the age of the deceased or the claimant whichever is higher would be applicable. Para 9 and 10 of the report are apposite:-
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - G P Mittal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next