Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 131 (1.07 seconds)
Documents citing Global Energy Ltd. & Anr vs M/S Adani Exports Ltd. & Ors on 3 May, 2005

Three Star Poultry Farm vs The Governmnent Of Tamil Nadu on 25 April, 2014

(e) Similar view was taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the decision reported in AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2653 (GLOBAL ENERGY LTD. AND ANOTHER V. M/S.ADANI EXPORTS LTD. AND OTHERS), wherein, it has been held that The terms of the invitation to tender are not open to judicial scrutiny and the Courts cannot whittle down the terms of the tender as they are in the realm of contract unless they are wholly arbitrary, discriminatory or actuated by malice.
Madras High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Garware-Wall Ropes Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 October, 2007

89. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Sterling Computers case, Tata Cellular case, Global Energy case and B.S.N. Joshi & Sons case are all guiding factors while deciding a contract of this nature and in the matter of judicial scrutiny, the power of relaxation and the scope of interference in the Government contract has been carefully analysed in these judgments and I have given due consideration to the same.
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - V Dhanapalan - Full Document

Elico Ltd vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 31 December, 2015

13. rt Having gone through the aforesaid provisions, we find nothing therein to indicate that there is any kind of prohibition for one government department in placing a direct order with another government department. While awarding contracts, the State and its agencies can always be treated as a separate class as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court Global Energy Ltd. and another versus Adani Exports Ltd. and others (2005) 4 SCC 435.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Gorakh Prasad & Ors vs The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors on 12 September, 2017

27. On the point of judicial restrain and on judicial scrutiny with respect to fixation rate of transportation, it has been submitted the Court should maintain restrain, learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Air India Ltd. vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2000(2) S.C.C. 617 and Global Energy Ltd. and Another vs. Adani Exports Ltd. and Others, reported in 2005(4) S.C.C. 435.
Patna High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - S Pandey - Full Document

M/S Bengal Tools Limited (Agro ... vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 23 April, 2015

In support of various contentions, he relies on Meerut Development Authority v. Assn. of Management Studies, (2009) 6 SCC 171, Global Energy Ltd. And another v. Adani Exports Ltd. And others, (2005) 4 SCC 435, Directorate of Education and others v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd. And others, (20040 4 SCC 19, LIC v. Consumer Education and Research Centre, (1995) 5 SCC 48 and Rashbihari Panda v. State of Orissa, (1969) 1 SCC 414.
Gauhati High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - T Vaiphei - Full Document

H-Energy Private Limited vs Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory ... on 2 June, 2017

33. .......... The terms and conditions of the tender were expressly clear by which the Authority as well as the bidders were bound and such conditions are not open to judicial scrutiny unless the action of the tendering authority is found to be malicious and misuse of its statutory powers. (See Tata Cellular v. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC 651], Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd. [(2000) 2 SCC 617], Directorate of Education v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd. [(2004) 4 SCC 19], Assn. of Registration Plates v. Union of Inida [(2004) 5 SCC 364], Global Energy Ltd. v. Adani Exports Ltd. [(2005) 4 SCC 435] and Puravankara Projects Ltd. v. Hotel Venus International [(2007) 10 SCC 33].)"
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next