Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 102 (1.23 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 5 September, 2018

Santosh Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 5 August, 2020

The judgments relied by the learned counsel for the respondent State are not relevant in the facts and circumstances of this case, except in the case of "Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. State of Bihar & Ors." supra. It appears from this case that the other cases relied by the learned counsel for the respondent State are different. It is well settled proposition of law that once a person participated in the proceeding, they are not allowed to challenge the same. The facts of this case from the present case are different.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Jairuddin Shaik vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 September, 2020

Applying the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the judgments referred supra to the facts of the present case, the petitioners appeared for the examination after going through the selection process prescribed under G.O.Ms.No.67 dated 26.10.2018, more particularly, for the Secondary Grade Teachers i.e., merit based on the marks secured both in TRT-cum-TET examination. Hence, based on the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the judgments referred supra, the petitioners 32 MSM,J W.P.No.15355 of 2019 & W.P.No.2368 of 2020 are disentitled to raise such contention, having participated in the selection process. On this ground alone, the petitions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the point is held against the petitioners and in favour of the first respondent.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 36 - Cited by 1 - M S Murthy - Full Document

Ajay Meena S/O Sitaram Meena vs The Rajasthan High Court Johdpur ... on 1 October, 2024

8. This writ petition filed by the petitioners deserves to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly, the petitioners are estopped to challenge the process of selection after participating in the same as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (supra); secondly, the petitioners have not made any complaint at the time (Downloaded on 02/10/2024 at 09:53:23 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:41769-DB] (7 of 7) [CW-12895/2024] of written test to their respective invigilator with regard to any fault either in the computer or with the keyboard provided to them in the examination hall; thirdly, the petitioners have voluntarily signed the certificate that their computer and keyboard are functioning properly at the time when the type test was conducted.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Prajapat vs The Rajasthan High Court ... on 8 November, 2024

8. This writ petition filed by the petitioners deserves to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly, the petitioners are estopped to challenge the process of selection after participating in the same as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (supra); secondly, the petitioners have not made any complaint at the time of written test to their respective invigilator with regard to any fault either in the computer or with the keyboard provided to them in the examination hall; thirdly, the petitioners have voluntarily signed the certificate that their computer and keyboard are functioning properly at the time when the type test was conducted.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document

Gurugubelli Swathi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 September, 2020

Applying the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the judgments referred supra to the facts of the present case, the petitioners appeared for the examination after going through the selection process prescribed under G.O.Ms.No.67 dated 26.10.2018, more particularly, for the Secondary Grade Teachers i.e., merit based on the marks secured both in TRT-cum-TET examination. Hence, based on the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the judgments referred supra, the petitioners 32 MSM,J W.P.No.15355 of 2019 & W.P.No.2368 of 2020 are disentitled to raise such contention, having participated in the selection process. On this ground alone, the petitions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the point is held against the petitioners and in favour of the first respondent.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - M S Murthy - Full Document

Vikarm Saini S/O Nand Lal Verma vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 July, 2021

This writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly, the petitioner is estopped to challenge the selection process after participating in the same as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ashok Kumar (supra); secondly, the result of the selection process was declared by the respondent(s) on 07.07.2020 and the appointments have already been given to the selected candidates and the petitioner has filed this writ petition on 13.07.2021, after a delay of one year and lastly I am not inclined to exercise the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - I Singh - Full Document

Mahind Kumar Gurjar S/O Prathviraj ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 10 August, 2021

(6 of 6) [CW-5631/2021] The writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly, the petitioner has participated in the selection process after reading the terms and conditions of the advertisement dated 13.04.2018, therefore, he is estopped to challenge the same; secondly, in view of the judgment passed by passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ashok Kumar (supra) a candidate cannot challenge the terms and conditions of the advertisement after participating in the selection process; thirdly, the result of the examination in question has already been declared by the RPSC and third party rights have been created, therefore, I am not inclined to exercise the extra-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - I Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next