Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Raman Kirpal vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 6 November, 2006

State vs . Anil on 24 March, 2014

It is a virtue which attaches to a female owing to her sex. The act of pulling a woman, removing her saree, coupled with a 31 of 38 32 FIR No. 101/12 PS - Kanjhawala request for sexual intercourse, is such as would be an outrage of the modesty of a woman; and knowledge, that modesty is likely to be outraged, is sufficient to constitute the offence without any deliberate intention having such outrage alone for its object. (Ref. 'Ram Kirpal Vs. State of MP', AIR 2007 SC (Supp) 49).
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Irshad Kureshi on 21 February, 2013

What constitutes an outrage to female modesty is nowhere defined in IPC. The essence of a woman's modesty is her sex. The culpable intention of the accused is the crux of the matter. The reaction of the woman is very relevant, but its absence is not always decisive. Modesty in this Section is an attribute associated with female human beings as a class. It is a virtue which attaches to a female owing to her sex. The act of pulling a woman, removing her saree, coupled with a request for sexual intercourse, is such as would be an outrage of the modesty of a woman; and knowledge, that modesty is likely to be outraged, is sufficient to constitute the offence without any deliberate intention having such outrage alone for its object. (Ref: Ram Kirpal Vs. State of MP AIR 2007 SC (Supp) 49).
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1). Param Hans on 25 February, 2012

What constitutes an outrage to female modesty is nowhere defined in IPC. The essence of a woman's modesty is her sex. The culpable intention of the accused is the crux of the matter. The reaction of the woman is very relevant, but its absence is not alway decisive. Modesty in this Section is an attribute associated with female human beings as a class. It is a virtue which attaches to a female owing to her sex. The act of pulling a woman, removing her saree, coupled with a request for sexual intercourse, is such as would be an outrage of the modesty of a woman; and knowledge, that 23 of 34 24 FIR No. 315/2009 PS Aman Vihar modesty is likely to be outraged, is sufficient to constitute the offence without any deliberate intention having such outrage alone for its object. (Ref: Ram Kirpal Vs. State of MP AIR 2007 SC (Supp) 49).
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sallamuddin on 26 July, 2012

What constitutes an outrage to female modesty is nowhere defined in IPC. The essence of a woman's modesty is her sex. The culpable intention of the accused is the crux of the matter. The reaction of the woman is very relevant, but its absence is not alway decisive. Modesty in this Section is an attribute associated with female human beings as a class. It is a virtue which attaches to a female owing to her sex. The act of pulling a woman, removing her saree, coupled with a request for sexual intercourse, is 16 of 23 17 FIR No. 546/2005 PS S.P. Badli such as would be an outrage of the modesty of a woman; and knowledge, that modesty is likely to be outraged, is sufficient to constitute the offence without any deliberate intention having such outrage alone for its object. (Ref: Ram Kirpal Vs. State of MP AIR 2007 SC (Supp) 49).
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1