Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Bahadur Lal And 4 Others vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ... on 20 August, 2019

Sidharth Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 December, 2020

In terms of the compromise the Suit No. 1408/11 has been decided by order dated 17.7.2020, Annexure No.6 making the compromise as part of the decree dated 17.7.2020 in regular Suit No. 1408/11 (Braj Lal and others Vs. Siddharth and others) In the compromise it was also settled that the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 33546 of 2017 pending before this Court and arising out of the complaint Case No. 24643 of 2012 under Sections 452 and 506 IPC, P.S. Phase-2, District Gautam Budh Nagar pending in the Court of ACJM II, Gautam Budh Nagar shall also be got decided on the basis of the said compromise. The compromise was duly verified by the court of Civil Judge (SD), Gautam Budh Nagar which fact is mentioned in the order dated 17.7.2020, Annexure No.6.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - R N Tilhari - Full Document

Virendra Nath vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 18 October, 2023

In view of the aforesaid and in view of Section 52(2) of the Act, 1953 and in view of the law laid down by this Court in Ram Bahadur & Anr. vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Siddharth nagar and Ors. 2006 (101) RD 11, the notification under Section 52 of the Act, 1953 did not affect the pending revisions and the said revisions had to be decided on merits and the Deputy Director of Consolidation was duty bound to decide the same on merits and in accordance with law....."
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document
1