Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 434 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing Manbhavati vs State Of U.P. And 06 Others on 26 November, 2019

Phagu Alias Nanaku vs State Of U.P. And 13 Others on 30 November, 2023

In view of the judgment passed by this Court in Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others), writ cannot be issued for execution of orders passed by revenue courts. It is further contended by learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing an execution application as the provisions of Civil Procedure Code are applicable to proceedings under Section 176 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gufran Ahmad Shaikh vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 4 December, 2023

3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that relief no.(i) cannot be granted to the petitioner in view of the judgment of passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Manbhavati vs. State of U.P. and others; 2020 1 AWC 789A as well as in Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others) holding that writ petition is not maintainable for enforcement/execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gautam Chauhan vs State Of Up And 10 Others on 4 April, 2024

3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devendra Kant Mishra vs State Of U P And 10 Others on 29 April, 2024

5. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Kripal vs State Of Up And 10 Others on 9 May, 2024

4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh Kumar Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And 10 Others on 6 May, 2024

3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of the orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Manbhavati vs. State of U.P. and others; 2020 1 AWC 789A as well as in Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 9 May, 2024

4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the present PIL is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Sharma vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 20 May, 2024

4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satyendra Kumar Pal vs State Of U.P And 6 Others on 9 July, 2024

4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of the orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Manbhavati vs. State of U.P. and others; 2020 1 AWC 789A as well as in Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A K Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next