Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Yogesh Sharma vs State on 27 March, 2015

Yogesh Sharma vs The State (Gnct Of Delhi) on 1 March, 2023

In the opinion of opinion of this Court, allegations in the written complaint of complainant are sufficient to cause grave 'injury' (as defined u/s 44 IPC) or danger to life or health (whether mental or physical) of complainant. As such, there is no reason to opine that facts, circumstances and allegations do not constitute offence u/s 498-A IPC. The argument of learned counsel for Yogesh Sharma vs. State Page 4 of 5 revisionist/accused that there was no unlawful demand at any point of time and therefore, offence u/s 498-A IPC is not made out, is misconceived in the light of unambiguous language of the said provision.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

(Pc Act) (Cbi) South District: Saket ... vs Lovely Sharma on 5 October, 2016

15 In view of these circumstances and above discussion, I am of the considered view, that Ld Trial Court was fully justified in discharging Sukhinder Parmar and Ruby Parmar in the present case and there is no illegality, irregularity and infirmity in the order, dated 19/05/2015. Revision petition filed by State qua accused Lovely Sharma, Shashi Sharma, Yogesh Sharma and Chanderkanta Sharma is also dismissed, being meritless, due to the above mentioned reasons as well as the reasons assigned in connected revision petitions i.e. Criminal Revision No. 47/15 titled as Lovely Sharma VS State & ors and Criminal Revision no. 48/15 titled as Yogesh Sharma Vs State and ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1