Shiva Nath Prasad vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 1 July, 2005
So far as it relates to cheating Mr. Shanti Bhusan cited the decisions of Ram Jas v. State of U.P., ; Aswini Kumar v. Emperor, and (supra).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.32 seconds)Documents citing
Aswini Kumar Chatterjee vs Emperor, On The Complaint Of Santosh ... on 8 February, 1921
Mahboob And Anr. vs Bibhuti Bhusan Gupta on 6 February, 1958
11. Before parting with the case it is necessary to stress one aspect. It was brought to our notice that colourable imitation may not amount to counterfeiting in all possible cases. This objection however was not taken before us by the learned Advocate appearing for the accused, nor was the point argued. The case of Aswini Kumar v. Emperor decided by a Division Bench of this Court, dealt with a case of similar nature where the point that came up was whether "Nortons" was a counterfeit of "Mortons". The learned Judges who decided the case upheld the conviction u/Section 486 IPC In the circumstances, we do not wish to pursue this point further in this revisional application.
Md. Mahboob And Anr. vs Bibhuti Bhusan Gupta on 6 February, 1958
11. Before parting with the case it is necessary to stress one aspect. It was brought to our notice that colourable imitation may not amount to counterfeiting in all possible cases. This objection however was not taken before us by the learned Advocate appearing for the accused, nor was the point argued. The case of Aswini Kumar v. Emperor decided by a Division Bench of this Court, dealt with a case of similar nature, where the point that came up was whether "Nortons" was a counterfeit of "Mortons". The learned Judges who decided the case upheld the conviction Under Section 486 I. P. C. In the circumstances, we do not wish to pursue this point further in this revisional application.
1