Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)

R.N. Prakash vs Smt. Saraswathi on 23 December, 1998

8. The above decision was followed by Justice Raju (as he then was) in the decision reported in Kannaiyan v. Subramaniya Pathar . Learned Judge, after referring to the decision of Justice Rengasamy cited supra, held thus, "...Even de hors the said line of approach, I am of the view that a Forum or Authority, which has been conferred with jurisdiction to entertain a lis for adjudication of a dispute involving a decision of the rights parties before it must be considered to have all the essential and necessary powers to effectively discharge its duties. .. .. .."
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.N. Prakash vs Smt. Saraswathi on 23 December, 1998

8. The above decision was followed by Justice Raju (as he then was) in the decision reported in Kannaiyan v. Subramaniya Pathar . Learned Judge, after referring to the decision of Justice Rengasamy cited supra, held thus, ...Even de hors the said line of approach, I am of the view that a forum or authority, which has been conferred with jurisdiction to entertain a lis for adjudication of a dispute involving a decision of the rights parties before it must be considered to have all the essential and necessary powers to effectively discharge its duties....
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1