Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 85 (1.40 seconds)
Documents citing Mahesh Kumar Agrawal vs Idbi Bank Ltd. 21 Cont/706/2017 ... on 26 February, 2018

Sh. Mukul Mittal vs Sr. Superintendent Policy Regional ... on 2 February, 2026

36. Applying the aforesaid legal position, as enunciated in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal Vs. Union of India & Anr. (supra), to the facts of the present cases, it is evident that in W.P.(C) 701/2025, although bail has been granted to the petitioner in the appellate proceedings arising from his conviction, the Court has not issued any specific directions with respect to Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT W.P.(C) 6612/2025 and Connected Matters Page 30 of 31 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:03.02.2026 19:27:36 the issuance or renewal of a passport, nor granted a "No Objection Certificate" / permission to depart for that purpose. Accordingly, it would be incumbent upon the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the concerned Court seeking such permission.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S Datta - Full Document

Suresh Bhansali vs Union Of India (2026:Rj-Jd:9774) on 20 February, 2026

25. The present case also stands on a materially stronger footing than the case considered by the Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr. In that case, the appellant was not only facing criminal proceedings but had also suffered a conviction in a separate matter, albeit with the sentence suspended. Even in such circumstances, the Supreme Court declined to uphold a rigid or mechanical (Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 12:13:31 PM) (Downloaded on 06/03/2026 at 09:23:28 PM) [2026:RJ-JD:9774] (11 of 14) [CRLW-781/2026] application of Section 6(2)(f). In the present case, the petitioner is not a convicted person and further proceedings in the criminal case stand stayed qua him. The justification for withholding or truncating renewal of the passport is, therefore, even weaker.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - F Ali - Full Document

Suresh Bhansali vs Union Of India (2026:Rj-Jd:9775) on 20 February, 2026

25. The present case also stands on a materially stronger footing than the case considered by the Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr. In that case, the appellant was not only facing criminal proceedings but had also suffered a conviction in a separate matter, albeit with the sentence suspended. Even in such circumstances, the Supreme Court declined to uphold a rigid or mechanical (Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 12:13:59 PM) (Downloaded on 06/03/2026 at 09:23:29 PM) [2026:RJ-JD:9774] (11 of 14) [CRLW-781/2026] application of Section 6(2)(f). In the present case, the petitioner is not a convicted person and further proceedings in the criminal case stand stayed qua him. The justification for withholding or truncating renewal of the passport is, therefore, even weaker.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - F Ali - Full Document

S.Nithin Karthick vs The Regional Passport Officer on 25 February, 2026

The first respondent is directed to issue the petitioner’s passport, after following due procedure, by __________ Page9 of 11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/03/2026 01:44:42 pm ) WP No. 6393 of 2026 considering his explanation dated 05.01.2026, in the light of the dicta laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India and Another (cited supra). The said exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that, for travelling abroad, the petitioner shall obtain permission from the concerned Judicial Magistrate before whom the cases are pending. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

Vimaleswaran Chandrasekaran vs The Regional Passport Officer on 2 February, 2026

The first respondent is directed to renew/re-issue the petitioner’s passport, after following due procedure, by considering the representation dated 19.08.2025, in the light of the dicta laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India and Another (cited supra). The said exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that, for travelling abroad, the petitioner shall __________ Page9 of 11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 16/02/2026 07:57:59 pm ) WP No. 2866 of 2026 obtain permission from the concerned Judicial Magistrate before whom the cases are pending. No costs.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

Sagar Pradeep Oak vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 April, 2026

46) We are therefore of the view that, the Passport Authority while considering the suggestions of this Court, should also keep in mind the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satish Verma Vs. Union of India (Supra), Maneka Gandhi V/s Union of India (Supra)and Mahesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Supra). The Authorities are bound to follow the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in letter and spirit.
Bombay High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Brahma Sheo Bharat Mall vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 April, 2026

46) We are therefore of the view that, the Passport Authority while considering the suggestions of this Court, should also keep in mind the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satish Verma Vs. Union of India (Supra), Maneka Gandhi V/s Union of India (Supra)and Mahesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Supra). The Authorities are bound to follow the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in letter and spirit.
Bombay High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Brahma Sheo Bharat Mall vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 April, 2026

46) We are therefore of the view that, the Passport Authority while considering the suggestions of this Court, should also keep in mind the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satish Verma Vs. Union of India (Supra), Maneka Gandhi V/s Union of India (Supra)and Mahesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Supra). The Authorities are bound to follow the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in letter and spirit.
Bombay High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Mohammed Yasir vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:9001) on 18 February, 2026

25. The present case also stands on a materially stronger footing than the case considered by the Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr. In that case, the appellant was not only facing criminal proceedings but had also suffered a conviction in a separate matter, albeit with the sentence suspended. Even in such circumstances, the Supreme Court declined to uphold a rigid or mechanical application of Section 6(2)(f). In the present case, the petitioner is not a convicted person and further proceedings in the criminal case stand stayed qua him. The justification for withholding or truncating renewal of the passport is, therefore, even weaker.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - F Ali - Full Document

Pradeep Kumar Sarwogi vs Union Of India (2026:Rj-Jd:5365) on 29 January, 2026

25. The present case also stands on a materially stronger footing than the case considered by the Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr. In that case, the appellant was not only facing criminal proceedings but had also suffered a conviction in a separate matter, albeit with (Uploaded on 07/02/2026 at 01:01:00 PM) (Downloaded on 27/02/2026 at 08:37:11 PM) [2026:RJ-JD:5365] (12 of 13) [CRLW-2358/2025] the sentence suspended. Even in such circumstances, the Supreme Court declined to uphold a rigid or mechanical application of Section 6(2)(f). In the present case, the petitioner is not a convicted person and further proceedings in the criminal case stand stayed qua him. The justification for withholding or truncating renewal of the passport is, therefore, even weaker.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - F Ali - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next