Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Mohd. Yosuf Khan & Ors vs Kali Ram Das on 5 June, 2010

Puran Chand Aggarwal vs Lekh Raj on 16 April, 2014

Learned Counsel also relied upon the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Mohd. Yusuf v. Ram Nath, 1972 RLR (N) 36. The case dealt with the factual matrix where there were two separate tenancies between the same landlord and tenant. It was held that a single petition could be filed if there is common question of law and fact. Two premises had been let out in the same building but separately in the said case.
Delhi High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 70 - M Singh - Full Document

Abdul Hamid vs Qureshia Begam on 31 July, 2014

14. One last aspect which was urged on behalf of the petitioner/tenant was that one eviction petition cannot be filed with respect to two separate tenancy premises i.e one tenancy of the shop and other tenancy of the residential room. On this aspect I may note that there are two judgments of this Court which hold that joinder of causes of action by seeking eviction on different grounds is permissible under the Delhi Rent Control Act. The first judgment is of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Mohd. Yusuf Vs. Ram Nath 1972, RLR (N) 36 and the second judgment is of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Abnash Kaur Vs. Dr.Avinash Nayyar & Ors. 1974 RCR 350. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the argument urged on behalf of the petitioner/tenant that joinder of the cause of action is not permissible.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - V J Mehta - Full Document
1