Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.61 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Shivleela And Ors. vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 July, 2003

Raghavendra @ Raghavendra Reddy vs Sri. K. Ramachandra Murthy on 14 December, 2023

In this regard, he relies on the decision in the case of SMT. SHIVLEELA AND OTHERS VS. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANGALORE4. In this decision, a Division Bench of this Court was considering a case where certain passengers were traveling on the roof top of the bus and the said bus had met with an accident. It was held that the passenger takes a risk by traveling in breach of law and he must share the consequences flowing there from. It was observed that though there is a duty cast on the driver 4 ILR 2003 Kar. 3602
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri. K Ramachandra Murthy vs Raghavendra @ Raghavendra Reddy on 14 December, 2023

In this regard, he relies on the decision in the case of SMT. SHIVLEELA AND OTHERS VS. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANGALORE4. In this decision, a Division Bench of this Court was considering a case where certain passengers were traveling on the roof top of the bus and the said bus had met with an accident. It was held that the passenger takes a risk by traveling in breach of law and he must share the consequences flowing there from. It was observed that though there is a duty cast on the driver 4 ILR 2003 Kar. 3602
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri. Ashok Ramchandra Ganachari vs Shri. Rama Pandith Bhosale, on 24 September, 2012

9. Per contra, learned counsel for Insurer, inter- alia, contended and submitted that, the Tribunal has erred in fixing the contributory negligence at 5% and it is liable to be enhanced, on the ground that, appellant himself has invited trouble by standing on the foot board of the maxicab and he fell down due to his negligence only. Further, he submitted that, the Tribunal ought to have fixed contributory negligence at 50% on the part of the appellant, in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Mayamma Vs. Sri.Siddaiah and another reported in ILR 2003 Karnataka 1179 and in the case of Smt. Shivleela and others Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation by Managing Director, Bangalore reported in ILR 2003 Karnataka 3602. 8 Further, he submitted that the Tribunal is justified in assessing the income of the appellant at `3,500/- per month and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other heads is on higher side and is liable to be reduced by modifying the impugned judgment and award passed by the Tribunal.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N K Patil - Full Document
1