Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.61 seconds)

Mohd. Ismail Noor Mohammad vs Fehmada Nahid And Ors. on 13 November, 1964

12. Although the case of Nalluswami Reddi v. Nallammal AIR 1943 Mad 392, was a case under Section 517 of the Criminal P.C., Horwill J. laid down that a question of title as to property cannot be satisfactorily decided by a criminal Court; but where property prima facie is taken by violence by one person under the colour of a civil claim the criminal Court should ordinarily order the property so taken by violence to be returned to the person from whom it was taken.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Prem Kumar Agrawal vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 August, 2014

In Nalluswami Reddi v. Nallammal reported in A.I.R. (30) 1943 Madras Page-392, it has been held as ―No Court subordinate to the High Court has any inherent jurisdiction to review its own judgment save in a few circumstances such as where there has been abuse of the process of Court, or fraud played upon the Court, or where petty clerical errors or mistakes have been made‖.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - A K Trivedi - Full Document

Shankar Lal vs Prem Sagar on 5 September, 1975

6. On behalf of non-applicants, reliance was placed on Nalluswami Reddi v. Nallammal AIR 1943 Mad 392::44 Cri LJ 554) wherein it has been held that a question of title to property cannot be satisfactorily decided by a Criminal Court; but where property is taken by violence by one person under the colour of a civil claim, the Criminal Court should ordinarily order the property so taken by violence to be returned to the person from whom it was taken.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1