Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Mrs. Roseline Wilson And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 12 January, 2007

Roseline Wilson (Deceased) & Ors. vs Archaeological Survey Of India & Ors. on 17 August, 2023

26. It is important to note that claim over the D'Eremao Cemetery, a centrally protected monument to the effect that the same is private property owned by the representing LPA 580/2023 Page 33 of 48 Signature Not Verified Digitaaly Signed By:BHUPINDER SINGH ROHELLA Signing Date:18.08.2023 11:13:24 unauthorised occupants is belied by your own case filed by you before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by way of WP(C) no.20917- 76/2015 titled as ―Roseline Wilson & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.‖ wherein you have clearly and specifically so stated in very clear words and plain language as reproduced hereunder :-
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S C Sharma - Full Document

Luice M Jacob vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 July, 2023

37. The Petitioners in W.P.(C) 2725/2018 approached this Court in W.P.(C) 20917-76/2016. The learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 12.01.2007 dismissed the said Writ Petition. The Petitioners preferred an LPA bearing No. 123/2007 titled as 'Roseline Wilson & Ors v. UOI'. The Hon'ble Division Bench vide order 16.10.2008 set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge with a direction to the ASI to once again consider the reply W.P.(C) 2725/2018 & 8203/2018 Signature Not Verified Page 17 of 21 Digitally Signed By:KOMAL DHAWAN Signing Date:13.07.2023 14:00:28 dated 20.09.2005 filed by the Petitioners and pass a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners. In the meantime, the parties were directed to maintain status quo qua the possession and construction of the said property. In the meanwhile, the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 8203/2018, filed a Civil Suit bearing No. 87/2005 seeking a declaration and permanent injunction against ASI and other Defendants therein to the effect that the Petitioner is the owner of the property in question by virtue of adverse possession. Learned Civil Court, vide Judgment dated 08.05.2014 negated the said plea and dismissed the said suit. Thereafter, an appeal bearing RCA No. 35/2015 was preferred by the Petitioner, which was also dismissed by learned Additional District Judge, Delhi vide Judgment dated 14.12.2015. A second appeal bearing RSA No. 159/2016 was also preferred by the Petitioner, but the same was also dismissed by this Court vide Judgment dated 19.07.2016. Hence the finding of the learned Civil Court attained finality.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Unknown vs B.Manoharan on 30 April, 2025

(g)(xi)A Delhi High Court decision was relied on 55/71 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 01:15:18 pm ) W.A.Nos.2401 of 2023 and 2570 of 2024, W.P.No.13881 of 2024 by learned Deputy Solicitor, i.e., Roseline Wilson and others Vs. Union of India reported in ILR(2007) II Delhi 514, wherein the case of the petitioners was that the petitioners have perfected title against 5th respondent by adverse possession as they are being in uninterrupted, peaceful and long settled possession of the property in question. They were issued notices under Section 4 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1958 but no proceedings were conducted. On 30.09.2005, show cause notice was issued by third respondent to about 40 occupants of the Christian Compound purportedly under the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and the rules thereunder and reply to show cause notice was not considered favourably and therefore, the petitioners preferred writ petition before Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court held that a notification issued in the gazette of India is valid and binding till any fresh notification withdrawing/repealing the earlier notification is issued. 56/71 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 01:15:18 pm ) W.A.Nos.2401 of 2023 and 2570 of 2024,
Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document
1