Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.28 seconds)
Documents citing Jayshree Ravi And Anr. vs University Of Delhi And Anr. on 17 September, 1993

Chhaya Tyagi vs University Of Delhi And Anr. on 22 November, 2023

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on various decisions of this court in the cases of Twinkle Wadhwa v. University of Delhi1, University of Delhi v. Varun Kapur2, Kanishka Aggarwal v. University of Delhi3, Jayshree Ravi & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Anr.4, Himani Sharma v. University of Delhi5 and Antariksha Anand v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University6.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Amanpreet Kaur Alias Amanpreet Nat vs State Of Punjab And Another on 15 October, 2025

Further, reliance is also placed upon in the case of 'Jayshree and another vs. State of Rajasthan and another' (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1640-1641 of 2024, decided on 02.07.2024), wherein it was held as under: "Prima facie, in our opinion, breach of contract does not amount to an offence under Section 420 or Section 406 of the IPC unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction. This Court has time and again cautioned against converting purely civil disputes into criminal cases. Any effort to settle civil disputes and claims, which do not involve any criminal offence, by applying pressure through criminal prosecution should be deprecated and discouraged."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pranjal Verma And Sawalia Saurabh vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 July, 1994

In Jayshree Ravi and another v. University of Delhi and another, Cwp No. 2603/92, decided on 17 September 1993, the case of the petitioner was that the decision of the University of Delhi to lay down eligibility condition of minimum 50% marks in aggregate for appearance in the entrance test for admission to LL.B. Course was illegal, arbitrary, irrational and was violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court by majority held that the eligibility condition of 50% as cut off percentage was in no way violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. This judgment, however, we do not find to be quite relevant to the issue involved in the present petition.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document
1