Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 103 (1.71 seconds)
Documents citing Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy And Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 7 May, 1991

State vs Deepak on 14 October, 2023

82. It is argued that there is no possibility of identifying the accused by PW-1 and PW-2 as alleged incident had taken place at 2.00 a.m. and the site plan Ex.PW14/B does not show the existence of any light pole on the spot and no TIP of the accused was conducted by the prosecution. The accused was for the first time identified by the complainant/PW-2 and his wife/PW-1 in the court. No effort was made by the IO for conducting the TIP of the accused. Reliance is placed upon State FIR No. 1149/2015 State Vs. Deepak Page No. 64 of 78 SC No. 58112/2016, PS Punjabi Bagh of Madhya Pradesh v. Ghudan - 2003 (12) SCC 485 and Bollavram Pedda Narsi Reddy v. State of A.P. - 1992 (2) SCR
Delhi District Court Cites 53 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramratan vs State Of M.P. on 22 June, 2022

agreed, speaking for the Court, observed that the substantive evidence of a witness is his statement in court but the purpose of test identification is to test that evidence and the safe rule is that the sworn testimony of witnesses in court as to the identity of the accused who are strangers to the witnesses, generally speaking, requires corroboration which should be in the form of an earlier identification proceeding or any other evidence. The law laid down in the aforesaid decision has been reiterated in the cases of Budhsen v. State of U.P., Sk. Hasib v. State of Bihar, Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy v. State of A.P., Ronny v. State of Maharashtra and Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra. It is well settled that identification parades are held ordinarily at the instance of the investigating officer for the purpose of enabling the witnesses to identify either the properties which are the subject-matter of alleged offence or the persons who are alleged to have been involved in the offence. Such tests or parades, in ordinary course, belong to the investigation stage and they serve to provide the investigating authorities with material to assure themselves if the investigation is proceeding on right lines. In other words, it is through these identification parades that the investigating agency is required to ascertain whether the persons whom they suspect to have committed the offence were the real culprits.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 1 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

State vs . Aasif Ali on 30 January, 2023

The law laid down in the aforesaid decision has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in [Budhsen and Anr. v. State of U.P., (1970 2 SCC 128), Sheikh Hasib alias Tabarak v. The State of Bihar, (1972 4 SCC 773), Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1991 3 SCC 434), Ronny alias Ronald James Alwaris and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, (1998 3 SCC 625) and Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra, (1999 8 SCC 428)].
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bachan Singh (Age 37 Years) vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 20 October, 2023

The law laid down in the aforesaid decision has been reiterated in the cases of Budhsen and Anr. v. State of U.P., [1970] 2 SCC 128, Sheikh Hasib alias Tabarak v. The State of Bihar, [1972] 4 SCC 773, Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, [1991] 3 SCC 434, Ronny alias Ronald James Alwaris and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, [1998] 3 SCC 625 and Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra, [1999] 8 SCC 428. It is well settled that identification parades are held ordinarily at the instance of the investigating officer for the purpose of enabling the witnesses to identify either the properties which are the subject matter of alleged offence or the persons who are alleged to have been involved in the offence. Such tests or parades, in ordinary course, belong to the investigation stage and they serve to provide the investigating authorities with material to assure themselves if the investigation is proceeding on right lines. In other words, it is through these identification parades that the investigating agency is required to ascertain whether the persons whom they suspect to have committed the offence were the real culprits.......
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Dhar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next