Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 296 (4.07 seconds)
Documents citing Ramjit Singh Kardam vs Sanjeev Kumar on 8 April, 2020

Kamal Nayan Singh And 12 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 5 December, 2022

Inasmuch as there exists a principle, duly recognized by the Supreme Court in Ramjit Singh Kardam & Ors. Vs. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. (supra), whereunder merely because the cadre under which the post may have been advertised would become a dying cadre, it may not automatically defeat the selection process (on such post for such dying cadre), a conscious decision making was required by the administrative authorities' vis-a-vis the claim of the petitioners, after evaluating the impact of that decision.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

V Sarveswar Reddy vs Department Of Personnel And Training on 30 April, 2025

26. Further, The 4th respondent cited the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Madal Lal & Ors v. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors, and Ramjit Singh Kardan & ors v. Sanjeev Kumar & ores (AIR 2020 SC 2060), wherein it has been held that an unsuccessful candidate cannot challenge the selection of a successful candidate after participating in the selection process on the principle of estoppel. Once the applicant has participated in the selection, on his failure to succeed in the selection, he has no right to challenge the very same selection, which is made in accordance with the prescribed provisions. Every employee has a right to be considered for selection subject to fulfilment of eligibility, but he cannot claim a right to selection itself and having been subjected to selection, he cannot later on turn around and challenge the selection on frivolous grounds.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suman Devi vs State Of Haryana And Another on 30 September, 2021

The Apex Court decided the issue in Ramjit Singh Kardam and others vs. Sanjeev Kumar and others, 2020 (2) SCT 491 and had protected the candidates to the extent that they were not to be asked for refund of salary or any benefit received and neither any refund was to be asked from those candidates who had, after their selection, worked and retired from service. In pursuance of the directions, selection process was to be conducted again and the petitioners had applied afresh.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Central Administrative Tribunal Chd ... on 6 November, 2020

On the Selection Criteria reliance is placed on "Ramjit Singh Kardam vs. Sanjeev Kumar & Others" 2020(2) SCT 491, "K Manjusree vs. State of A.P. & Another" 2008(2) SCT 6, "Himani Malhotra vs. High Court of Delhi" 2008(7) SCT 11, and "Kamal Kumar Gupta vs. 35 of 112 ::: Downloaded on - 07-11-2020 03:53:50 ::: CWP No.1660 of 2020(O&M) & #36# Connected Matters State of Haryana & Others" 1991 AIR (Punjab) 118.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 1 - J Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next