Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.72 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Aina Devi vs Bachan Singh And Anr. on 7 January, 1980

Sweeper vs Don Bosco School on 27 September, 2011

(xii) In view of the aforesaid, it is clear that the parivar register or extract thereof are not conclusive proof of the entries therein particularly that pertaining to the year of birth of the plaintiff and are merely admissible in evidence. Therefore, this Court respectfully differs from the above observation of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Aina Devi v. Bachan Singh & Anr. (supra).
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Vijayalakshmi vs K.P.Arun on 11 October, 2006

In addition to that, in the decision relied upon by the petitioner's counsel in Smt.Aina Devi vs. Bachan Singh, reported in AIR 1980 Allahabad 174, it has been held that insofar as the petition seeking for declaring a marriage to be null and void, no amount of delay could be said to be sufficient to disentitle the petitioner to the relief prayed for, in spite of the generality of the provisions of clause (d) of Section 23(1) of the Act and the abovesaid decision has been outlined as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harendra Nath Burman vs Sm. Suprova Burman And Anr. on 11 July, 1988

In Aina Devi v. Bachan Singh, AIR 1980 Delhi 174 , which was a case under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, where under certain marriage are declared to be null and void, it has been held by a learned single Judge that "the grounds on which a petition for declaring a marriage to be null and void may be filed under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act are such that no amount of delay could be said to be sufficient to disentitle a petitioner to relief there under in spite of the generality of the provisions of CL (d) of Section 23(1) of the Act." Section 23(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 34(1)(e) of the Special Marriage Act are in pari materia, both providing generally that delay may otherwise be a bar to reliefs under the Act. For the reasons stated hereinbefore in some details, we would agree with the observations made in the Delhi (Allahabad) decision.
Calcutta High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1   2 Next