Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Durgadan vs Devidan on 10 April, 1974

Sukhdev Singh vs Baxis Singh And Anr. on 24 January, 2006

RLW 1974 Raj. 296 (Durgadan v. Devidan)(supra)-In this case, this Court while considering the provisions of Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, in relation to a document, held that the document of sale on the basis of language, which was not registered as such did not amount to sale but only a contract for sale, therefore, plaintiff was not entitled to bring the suit for specific performance.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 45 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Harjeet vs Megha And Ors. on 29 February, 2000

In the matter of Durgadan v. Devidan, 1974 RLW 296, similar question arose for consideration of this Court. The plaintiff had sought specific performance in respect of a document per training to an agreement to sale which was not registered. It was held by this Court that it did not amount to sale but only to a contract for sale and so the plaintiff could pray for specific performance of the agreement. One of the issues which was framed by the trial Court in the proceedings which culminated in S.B. Civil Second Appeal before this Court was that whether the agreement which was not registered could be said to be inadmissible in evidence? This Court while deciding the second appeal observed in the following manner:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Dwarka Prasad vs Ciivil Judge (S D ) And Anr on 8 January, 2013

In the matter of Durgadan v. Devidan, 1974 RLW 296, similar question arose for consideration of this Court. The plaintiff had sought specific performance in respect of a document pertaining to an agreement to sell which was not registered. It was held by this Court that it did not amount to sale but only to a contract for sale and so the plaintiff could pray for specific performance of the agreement. One of the issues which was framed by the trial court in the proceedings which culminated in Civil Second Appeal before this court was that whether the agreement which was not registered, could be said to be inadmissible in evidence? This court, while deciding the second appeal, observed in the following manner:-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1