Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 61 (3.53 seconds)
Documents citing Manoj Kumar Chaudhary & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April, 2018

Mukesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 19 January, 2026

7. At this juncture, learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the SLP preferred by the State of Bihar also came to be dismissed on 15.01.2026, hence there is no impediment in extending the benefit in terms with the order passed by this Court in Kishor Kumar & Ors. (supra) as well as the order passed in CWJC No. 7938 of 2020 (Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) duly affirmed by the learned Division Bench in LPA No. 456 of 2021.
Patna High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H Kumar - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 31 October, 2018

"35. Our attention has been drawn by learned Senior counsel, appearing for the Board, to the effect that the decision of this Court in case of Manoj Kumar (Supra), which has been relied upon by learned Single Judge, in his order under appeal, has been affirmed by a Division Bench decision of this Court reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 578 (Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.). Those cases had arisen out of preliminary test held by the Bihar Public Service Commission. In the said preliminary test, certain questions were found to have been incorrectly framed, which were decided Patna High Court CWJC No.17302 of 2018 dt. 31-10-2018 81/86 to be weeded out for the purpose of re-evaluation of the mark sheets. On going through the said decisions, we find that on many occasions, situations had arisen, where, in a multiple-choice question type test, framing of incorrect questions came to be detected after the examination had been held by statutory bodies, sometimes suo motu and sometimes after objections having been raised by the test takers, giving rise to several litigations. In order to remedy such a situation, the bodies, holding such tests, adopt different ways and means, of which the present case is a living example. Initially, when the Board had detected certain questions to be wrong, it had decided to delete such questions and re-evaluate the answer sheets on the basis of the remaining questions on pro rata basis. Subsequently, when more questions were detected to be incorrect by the expert body, they decided to give additional marks for each such incorrect question across the Board.
Patna High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 1 - S Pandey - Full Document

Ashoke Krantti And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 19 July, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52ndto 55thbatch.
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Suman Kumar vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 19 July, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52ndto 55thbatch.
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Balmukund Thakur And Ors vs Bihar School Examination Board And Ors on 19 July, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52ndto 55thbatch.
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Kunal Kumar vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 19 July, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52ndto 55thbatch.
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - M K Shah - Full Document

Anjana Rani And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 19 July, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52ndto 55thbatch.
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

Chandra Prakash Sharma And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 9 August, 2019

19. Some of the counsels of the petitioners, therefore, urge that the best option would be to delete the number of wrong questions irrespective of the recommendation of the committees as to award of marks and evaluate the answers on the left over correct questions. There shall not be any chaos and confusion because the evaluation will be done on true merits of reduced number of questions. That will be a uniform yardstick of testing the merit of all the candidates who participated in the examination and it will not create any bias in favour of the candidates sitting at the top who will end up with more weightage or marks than they would have earned in TET examination. Reliance was placed by the counsel for some of Patna High Court CWJC No.11762 of 2018 dt.09-08-2019 43/70 the petitioners in a case reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 542, which is the case of Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar. It is the matter related to similar kind of wrong questions in an examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission for 52nd to 55th batch.
Patna High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - M K Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next