Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.87 seconds)
Documents citing Omkar Sharma And Ors. vs Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board on 20 May, 2005

Bhole Bhandari Charitable ... vs Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board (Sasb) on 22 July, 2025

46. The reason for this Court to say and hold that the respondent No. 1 qualifies to be an Authority under Article 18 WP(C) No. 1185/2025 2025:JKLHC-JMU:1886 12 of the Constitution of India is that, unlike the Jammu & Kashmir Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board constituted under the Jammu & Kashmir Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1988 which has been held not to count as a State or an Authority within the meaning of article 12 of the Constitution of India, in terms of judgment in the case of "Omkar Sharma and others Vs Mata Vaishno Devi shrine Board and others," 2005(III) JKJ 388 the respondent No. 1 is distinctly placed in terms of its statutory make under the Jammu & Kashmir Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Act, 2000.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R Bharti - Full Document

Reserved On: 05.03.2026 vs State Of J&K & Ors on 12 March, 2026

12. After passing of order dated 28.01.2005 passed by the Supreme Court in the present case and judgment dated 28.09.2004 in Chain Singh's case (supra), the issue whether the Shrine Board is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court came to be decided by a Division Bench of this Court in Omkar Sharma & Ors Vs. Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board (2005) 3 JKJ 388.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Dhar - Full Document

Vikas Dhawan vs Shri on 3 January, 2015

This issue has been dealt with by a Division Bench of this Court in case titled Omkar Sharma and ors vs. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board and connected matters, reported in 2005 (1) SLJ 260, wherein it was held that Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board has been constituted under a statute and in absence of any control of the Government it cannot be said to be State or an authority within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It was further held that writ petition for enforcement of fundamental rights against the Shrine Board would not be maintainable. The dictum of law is loud and clear that Shri Mata 8 Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, not being an instrumentality of the State, is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. That being so, the instant writ petition is held to be not maintainable and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Bansi Lal Bhat) Judge Jammu 03.01.2015 Bir 
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikas Dhawan vs State Th.Home Deptt.And Ors. on 3 January, 2015

This issue has been dealt with by a Division Bench of this Court in case titled Omkar Sharma and ors vs. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board and connected matters, reported in 2005 (1) SLJ 260, wherein it was held that Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board has been constituted under a statute and in absence of any control of the Government it cannot be said to be "State" or an "authority" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It was further held that writ petition for enforcement of fundamental rights against the Shrine Board would not be maintainable.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1