Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.34 seconds)

Hrushikesh Das And Ors. vs Shree Shree Brundaban Jew Thakura And ... on 17 June, 2003

4. When the fact noted in the impugned order indicates that the consolidation proceeding had already gone to the stage of Section 15 of the Act, it is not necessary for this Court to enter into the legal controversy as argued by the parties inasmuch as the ratio in the case of Somanath Bhataria (supra) is sufficient to dispose of the Civil Revision. In that case, this Court has held that:
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P K Tripathy - Full Document

Dhobei Behera (Dead) & Others vs Babaji Behera on 25 February, 2025

Purna Chandra Sahu & Others vs. Gangadhar Sahu reported in 63 (1987) CLT 542, Somnath Bhataria Vs. Punananda Bhataria & Others reported in 72 (1991) C.L.T. 316, Shankarrao Dajisaheb Shinde (since deceased) by heirs Vs. Vithalrao Ganpatrao Shinde and Others reported in AIR 1989 SC 879 and Bharosilal and Others Vs. Mst. Shiladevi reported in AIR 1989 (Madhya Pradesh) 122 and contended that, the question of abatement S.A. No.150 of 1992 Page 12 of 22 of the present suit filed by the plaintiffs as per Section 4 (4) of the OCH & PFL Act, 1972 does not arise, as there was no specific order for the same and the decision of the consolidation authorities in objection Case No.240 of 1980 as per Ext.H shall not operate as a bar or resjudicata for the adjudication of the present suit for partition and declaration between the parties in respect of the suit properties.
Orissa High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1