Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 184 (0.59 seconds)
Documents citing Hem Chander Malik vs Uoi & Ors. on 26 September, 2011

Union Of India vs Ramesh Kumar & Anr. on 17 December, 2018

5. Through the appeal filed by the appellant, it was submitted that the verdict in "Shashi Aggarwal & Anr. Vs. Union of India" (supra) was to be assailed before this Court or before the Supreme Court and it is essential to observe that L.A.APP.223/2013 filed by the appellant in the said case against order in LAC 111A/2009 in "Shashi Aggarwal & Anr. Vs. Union of India" has been dismissed, it having been observed to the effect that the said order suffered from no infirmity or illegality as it granted compensation at par with compensation granted to similarly situated persons in LAC 358/2007 in the case "Hem Chander Malik Vs. Union of India" decided on 26.09.2011 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Sh. Prakash Chander vs Uoi Lac No. 53A/09 on 10 January, 2013

Hence, petitioner would be entitled to market value @ Rs.12,96,455.89/­ per acre as determined in Hem Chander Mallik (Supra). Otherwise also, if we calculate the market value of the land at the rate fixed by the LAC by giving an enhancement of 11% w.e.f. 01.04.99 i.e. the rate fixed by the government policy @ Rs.12,16,000/­ per acre will come to Rs.12,94,027/­ per acre as on 27.10.99. Therefore, there is no reason with this court to differ with the price as assessed by Hon'ble High Court in Hem Chander Mallik. Otherwise also, this being a beneficial legislation, the benefits as per judgment of Hon'ble High Court should be given to the petitioner. The rate of the land of the petitioner, therefore, is fixed @ Rs.12,96,455.89/­ per acre.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Wadhuva Brothers & Anr. on 17 December, 2018

4. Through the appeal filed by the appellant, it was submitted that the verdict in "Shashi Aggarwal & Anr. Vs. Union of India" (supra) was to be assailed before this Court or before the Supreme Court and it is essential to observe that L.A.APP.223/2013 filed by the appellant in the said case against order in LAC 111A/2009 in "Shashi Aggarwal & Anr. Vs. Union of India" has been dismissed, it having been observed to the effect that the said order suffered from no infirmity or illegality as it granted compensation at par with compensation granted to similarly situated persons in LAC 358/2007 in the case "Hem Chander Malik Vs. Union of India" decided on 26.09.2011 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Malhotra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next