Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing I.Shanthamma vs State Of Telangana on 23 July, 2018

Smt. D.Seethamahalakshmi. vs The State Through Inspector, Acb, Ranga ... on 3 August, 2022

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that no work was pending with the accused officer and the register was already signed. P.W.2, who is the mediator who accompanied P.W.1 into the office stated that "in my presence the accused officer did not take any bribe nor she accepted any amount from P.W.1". For the said reason and when the amount was recovered from the room in the open trunk box, it cannot be said that the accused officer had demanded and accepted the amount of bribe. He also relied on the judgments; i) K.Shanthamma v. The State of Telangana1 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that proof of demand of bribe is sine qua non for establishing an offence under Section 7 of the Act of 1988; ii) S.Shankar v. State, ACB, Karimnagar Range2, this Court held that presumption under Section 20 of the Act of 1988 cannot be drawn unless prima facie evidence is found regarding the demand and acceptance of bribe; iii) Ganga 1 2002 LiveLaw(SC) 192 2 2022 (1) ALD (Crl.
Telangana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.Ramachander Rao, vs The State Of Ap Rep By Its Spl. Pp Hyd., For ... on 14 August, 2024

He also relied on the following judgments: i) K.Shanthamma v. State of Telangana (2022) 4 Supreme Court Cases 574); ii) B.Jayaraj v. State of A.P (2014) 13 SCC 55); iii) V.Sejappa v. State (2016) 12 SCC 150), iv) C.M.Girish Babu v. CBI, Cochin, High Court of Kerala (2009) 3 SCC 779; v) N.Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) 3 SCC 687, (vi) P.Satyanarayana Murthy v. DI Police, State of A.P ( 2015 (10) 9 SCC 152), vii) Suraj Mal v. The State (Delhi Administration) (1979) 4 SCC 725); viii)T.K.Ramesh Kumar v. State through Police Inspector, Bangalore (2015) 15 SCC (Cri) 629;
Telangana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri E.Rukumangada Reddy A2 vs The State Of A.P. Rep., By Its Spl Pp For ... on 14 August, 2024

He also relied on the following judgments: i) K.Shanthamma v. State of Telangana (2022) 4 Supreme Court Cases 574); ii) B.Jayaraj v. State of A.P (2014) 13 SCC 55); iii) V.Sejappa v. State (2016) 12 SCC 150), iv) C.M.Girish Babu v. CBI, Cochin, High Court of Kerala (2009) 3 SCC 779; v) N.Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) 3 SCC 687, (vi) P.Satyanarayana Murthy v. DI Police, State of A.P ( 2015 (10) 9 SCC 152), vii) Suraj Mal v. The State (Delhi Administration) (1979) 4 SCC 725); viii)T.K.Ramesh Kumar v. State through Police Inspector, Bangalore (2015) 15 SCC (Cri) 629;
Telangana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1