Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Employees ... vs Government Of India And Anr. on 24 April, 1989

22. It will also be noted that in the absence of any statute like the Maharashtra Act (1 of 1971), the parties are only governed by the 'Code of Discipline'. This is clear from the observations of the Rajasthan High Court in a recent judgment in Hindustan Copper Mazdoor Sangh v. Chief Labour Commr, 1986 Lab IC 1845. Sharma, J. brought in this matter in the following words (at pp. 1848-1849) :-
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M J Rao - Full Document

Tnpl Podhy Thozilalar Sangam vs The General Manager (H.R.) on 22 October, 2009

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the issues raised in the present writ petition are to be agitated before the concerned Labour Court/Tribunal, by invoking the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He had also placed before this Court, a decision of the Rajasthan High Court, reported in 1986 II L.L.N. Rajasthan High Court 228 (Hindustan Copper Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Chief Labour Commissioner (C), Ministry of Labour, Government of India and others), to show that the High Court in its writ jurisdiction cannot quash the recognition given to a particular employees union and it cannot accord recognition to the representative union, having exclusive right to be a bargaining agent for the workmen of the establishment concern.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M Jaichandren - Full Document
1