Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 124 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Pawan Kumar Upadhayay vs State Of Chhattisgarh 31 Wps/3907/2019 ... on 16 May, 2019

Pawan Kumar vs Ms Poonam on 8 May, 2024

11. In the preliminary objections, defendants stated that, the present suit not maintainable as the plaintiff has concealed material facts. It is further stated that, the present suit is hit by provisions of Hindu Succession Act whereby the adopted child of deceased is barred from claiming the inherited CS DJ ADJ 935/19 Pawan Kumar Vs. Poonam & Anr. Pg. No. 7 of 20 rights of his biological parents. It is further stated that, since the plaintiff had denied the factum of the status of the dDefendant No.1 but had not placed any documents to press or contend the locus of defendant no.1 hence the plaint itself suffers from the concealment of facts, as such the suit deserved to be dismissed. It is further stated that, the plaintiff has failed to project, his legal right, title or interest in the suit property hence the present suit is liable to be dismissed. In his para-wise reply, defendants have denied all the contents of the plaint.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs Smt.Kanchan on 28 January, 2020

In view of above discussions, the appeal is allowed and impugned order dated 13.09.2019 passed by Principal Judge, Family court, Sultanpur is set-aside. The case is remanded back to the concerned Principal Judge, Family court, Sultanpur to decide the petition bearing Original Suit No.281 of 2019 (Pawan Kumar Vs. Kanchan), after affording opportunity of hearing to both the parties, in accordance with law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N K Johari - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs Manoj Verma on 15 December, 2025

16. Consequently, in light of the foregoing discussion and keeping in view the aforenoted judicial precedents, law as well as the submissions addressed before this Court, this Court unambiguously reiterates that the order dated 26.09.2025, passed by Ld. JMFC (Reliever), Central Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in case bearing, 'Pawan Kumar v. Manoj Verma, CC NI Act No. 9892/2024', dismissing the appellant's complaint on the aspect of maintainability is not amenable to the appellate jurisdiction of this Court, in particular that under Section 413 BNSS/Section 372 Cr.P.C., for the aforesaid reasons. Accordingly, in light of the above, this Court unambiguously observes that present appeal deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed, as not maintainable.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs Gopi And Ors on 7 October, 2022

2.0. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for setting aside the order dated 08.07.2022 passed in Crl. Revision no. 63/2021, titled as „Pawan Kumar vs. Gopi & Ors., passed by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge, East District, KKD Courts, Delhi as well as order dated 08.04.2021 passed by Ld. CMM, East, KKD Courts, Delhi in case titled as „Pawan Kumar v. Gopi etc.‟ in Ct. Case no. 2388/2020.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mona Rani @ Monika vs Pawan Kumar on 21 October, 2024

Keeping in view the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant and also considering the settled position of law about weightage to be given to the convenience of wife, in case of transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, the application is hereby accepted and the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/911/2023, titled 'Pawan Kumar Vs. Mona Rani', filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Ludhiana, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Dabwali, District Sirsa. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Ludhiana, to the District and Sessions Judge, Sirsa.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Puri - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next