Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Chander Mohan Mittal vs Bihari Lal Gupta on 1 March, 1985

Tirlok Singh Anand vs M/S Prem Chand And Sons And Others on 25 February, 2012

In Chander Mohan Mittal's case (supra), the tenant filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority against the order of ex-parte eviction. An objection was raised before the Appellate Authority that appeal is not maintainable and the order is revisable but the Appellate Authority did not agree on the ground that as per notification of the Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration dated 25.11.1972, the District Judge, Chandigarh, had been empowered with the power of Appellate Authority under the Act who had the jurisdiction to hear the appeal. It was decided that "it can be said that the order setting aside ex-parte proceedings against the tenant was passed by the Rent Controller under the Act. As observed earlier, such an order was passed CR-2268-2008 (O&M) [5] :::::::
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

Tirlok Singh Anand vs M/S Prem Chand & Sons And Others on 29 May, 2012

Learned Single Judge while hearing the revision petition noticed the judgments of this court reported as Guranditta Ram Vs. Murari Lal & another 1974 PLR 579; Bikramjit Singh Paul Vs. Jaswant Singh 1976 PLR 16; Daya Chand Hardayal Vs. Bir Chand 1983 PLR 775 (F.B.); Chander Mohan Mittal Vs. Bihari Lal Gupta 1985 (1) PLR 458 & Shri Krishan Lal & another Vs. The Punjab, C.R.No.2268 of 2008 (O&M) 3 Backward Classes Land Development & Finance Corporation, Chandigarh 1985 (2) RCR (Rent) 59, wherein this court has taken a view that the orders passed by the learned Rent Controller under Sections 4, 10, 12 & 13 alone are appealable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1