Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 76 (2.37 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Ram Sakhi Devi vs Chhatra Devi And Ors on 12 July, 2005

Chhedilal And Anr. vs Rajaram (Deceased) Through His L.R'S. ... on 13 August, 2007

17. The case law in Govindraju v. Mariamman 2005 (1) AWC 787 (SC) and Ram Sakhi Devi v. Chhitra Devi and Ors. 2005 (3) AWC 2497 (SC), cited by Sri Bhargava in support of his submission that formation of the substantial question of law is a sine qua non for exercising jurisdiction under Section 100, C.P.C. are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case as in none of the above two authorities the position of law which existed prior to the enforcement of the Amendment Act, has been considered and taken into account. Both the cases deals with the position of law in respect of second appeals preferred subsequent to the enforcement of the Amendment Act. No other decision has been placed before me to demonstrate that framing of substantial question of law before deciding the second appeal is mandatory even in second appeals which have been preferred and admitted prior to the enforcement of the Amendment Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 1 - P Mithal - Full Document

Nune Prasad & Ors vs Nune Ramakrisna on 29 July, 2008

8. The position has been reiterated in Kanhaiyalal and Ors. v. Anupkumar and Ors. (2003 (1) SCC 430), Mathakala Krishnaiah v. V. Rajagopal (2004(10) SCC 676), Smt. Ram 6 Sakhi Devi v. Chhatra Devi & Ors. (JT 2005 (6) SC 167), Sasikumar & Ors. v. Kunnath Chellappan Nair & Ors. (2005 (12) SCC 588), Gian Dass v. The Gram Panchayat Village Sunner Kalan & Ors. (2006 (6) SCC 271), Shah Mansukhlal Chhaganial (d) through Lrs. V. Gohil Amarsing Govindbhai (d) through Lrs. (2006(13) SCALE 99).
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next