Balubha Ashabhai Manek vs Gujarat Water Supply And Sewarage Board on 6 March, 2020
"4. Learned advocate for the petitioner
submitted that once the Labour Court
had directed the reinstatement of the
petitioner and the said judgment and
award was confirmed by the High
Court, implicit in such direction would
be the grant of continuous service. It
was submitted that the continuity of
service is not considered for the
petitioner. The reasoning of the
authorities, as submitted by the
learned advocate for the petitioner,
was erroneous when five years period
is calculated from 05.11.2011 and not
from the date of joining which was
required to be considered as continuity
was granted.