Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)
Documents citing Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs Union Of India on 22 October, 2018

Ruturaj Rajendra Chavan vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 24 October, 2018

1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant on instructions submits that, the validity of the amended Section 18A under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is under challenge before the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1015 of 2018 (Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union of India), and in the said petition, show cause notices have been issued to the respondents therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Sambhuratna Ujwal Chunge And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 24 October, 2018

2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant on instructions submits that, the validity of the amended Section 18A under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is under challenge 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 26/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 27/10/2018 02:05:27 ::: Nalawade 901-apeal-1230-18.doc before the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1015 of 2018 (Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union of India), and in the said petition, show cause notices have been issued to the respondents therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Praksh Sandipan Barde And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 2 November, 2018

the validity of the amended Section 18A under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is under challenge before the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1015 of 2018 (Prathvi Raj Chauhan Vs. Union of India), and in the said Petition, show cause notices have been issued to the Respondents therein. 2] It is submitted that the subject matter of the said Writ Petition has bearing on the issues/subject matter involved in the present Appeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document
1