Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 88 (2.28 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 19 November, 1976

Harish Arora And Ors vs The Deputy Registrar Of Co Operative Soc ... on 9 June, 2025

29. The respondents' reliance on the decision of Jai Singh v. Union of India [(1977) 1 SCC 1] is misplaced. In that case, the petitioner had already chosen to file a civil suit, and also raised issues involving disputed facts which were not suitable for summary determination by a writ court. In the present case, however, there are no complex or disputed facts requiring a full- fledged trial. The documents and proceedings relied upon by both parties are largely on record. The real issue is how the law applies to those facts, and that is something well within the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Tanzeem Khursheed Zargar vs J&K Special Tribunal & Ors on 29 October, 2022

In Jai Singh v. Union of India, (1977) 1 SCC 1 : AIR 1977 SC 898 the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered a case wherein the petitioner filed a writ petition which was dismissed in limine. Subsequently, he filed a suit agitating the same subject-matter. The Court held that suit was not maintainable as a person cannot be permitted to pursue two P a g e | 11 parallel remedies in respect of the same subject-matter at the same time.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - W S Nargal - Full Document

Chhoga Ram Mundoliya vs The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 14 July, 1992

In this connection, he has placed reliance on Jai Singh v. Union of India . He has further submitted that since it is not a case of ordinary lease but it is a case of statutory lease as the minerals vest in the State Government and therefore, it is the State Government alone which can grant lease for operating the area and as per the Rules, it was the petitioner who had applied for grant of a lease. The Department had demarcated the area and the petitioner also deposited advance dead-rent. Thereafter, the lease was executed and registered and the lease-deed became effective from the date it was registered and the petitioner was liable to pay dead rent from that day.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 27 March, 2001

In Jai Singh v. Union of India (17), the Apex Court depricated the practice and tendency of a party approaching two different forums for the same relief. In that case the party had filed a suit and when it could not get interim relief, it approached the Writ Court by filing the writ petition, claiming the same relief. The Apex Court held that in such a situation, it is not permissible for the party to pursue two parallel remedies in respect of the same matter at the same time.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 74 - Cited by 0 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Johari Forts And Palaces Pvt. Ltd. vs Maharaja Narendra Singh And Ors. on 27 March, 2001

In Jai Singh v. Union of India , the Apex Court depricated the practice and tendency of a party approaching two different forums for the same relief. In that case the party had filed a suit and when it could not get interim relief, it approached the Writ Court by filing the writ petition, claiming the same relief. The Apex Court held that in such a situation, it is not permissible for the party to pursue two parallel remedies in respect of the same matter at the same time.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next