Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (2.92 seconds)

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Amrit Lal Jyotashi on 11 January, 2024

In the case of Maniben Devraj Shah vs. Municipal Corporation reported in AIR 2012 SC 1629, it is held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that in cases involving State and its agencies while deciding the application for condonation of delay the fact that sufficient time is taken in decision making process of State can be taken note by Court but delay cannot be condoned as matter of course on ground that dismissal will cause injury to public interest when the delay is due to total lethargy or utter negligence of its officers.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gitaba Bhurubha Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat on 7 February, 2024

(iii) Maniben Devraj Shah versus Municipal Corporation of Bruhin Mumbai - (2012) 5 SCC 157 (Paras 14, 15, 23 to 25 thereof) 5.4 He has submitted that when no sufficient cause is made out, learned appellate Court below has rightly rejected the application and there is no perversity or illegality in the findings given by the learned appellate Court below. He has submitted that no interference is called for by exercising the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. He has submitted that this petition may be dismissed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shankar Lal vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 3 October, 2024

In the matter of Maniben Devraj Shah v. Municipal Corporation and others, AIR 2012 Supreme Court 1629, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that court cannot become oblivious of the fact that successful litigant has acquired certain right on the basis of the judgement under challenge and a lot of time is consumed at various stages of litigation apart from the cost. In the present case, delay is not properly, satisfactorily or convincingly explained, therefore, no case is made out to condone the delay on sympathetic ground.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 Next