Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 173 (2.73 seconds)

Prakasa Spectro Cast Private Limited vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Heptachem And Pharma India Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Ap on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Tgv Sraac Limited vs The State Of Ap on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Maddi Lakshmaiah And Co Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Ap on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Chegu Mperium P Ltd vs The State Of Ap on 18 September, 2025

In Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Limited vs. Union of India and Ors., the Hon'ble Supreme Court was not looking at an interpretation of the Statute. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, after considering whether any guidelines, for exercise of discretion by the executive, can be extracted from the statement in the Objects and Reasons of that Statute, had held that such an exercise was permissible. In such circumstances, it would be open to this court to see if any such guidelines can be made out from the statement of Objects and Reasons, set out in Act 23 of 2024.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 95 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

A.P. Textile Mills Association, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

M/S Tgvsraac Limited vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

M/S Ganga Plastics vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 10 July, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 94 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fresh Bowl Horticulture Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 17 July, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J , W,P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch • multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 94 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ap Textile Mills Association vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 June, 2025

69. The law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the judgments cited above, is that the function of the legislature is to formulate the policy and purpose for which a Statute is sought to be enacted, leaving the details of the implementation to the executive. This latitude has to be given to the executive due to the complexity of present day economic activity and the 76 HCJ & RRR,J W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch multifarious requirements of the regulatory and taxation framework. However, this latitude is, explicitly or implicitly, controlled by the requirement of adhering to the purposes of the Statute. Therefore, this Court is required to see what the purpose and object of the Act is, and consider whether such an inherent control, over the discretion given to the executive, can be found and formulated.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next